Black And Red United: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

With Szetela out, what are DCU's options?

Steve Goff had mentioned that Danny Szetela had tweaked his knee, and the update earlier today was that it will require surgery. Like local snow totals, the news just keeps getting worse: United just announced on Behind the Badge that Szetela has a torn meniscus.

Once Troy Perkins was acquired, most of the talk concerning what the club should do next was about the need for a central midfielder of note. Opinions varied about Szetela, but he did seem to be the player most suited to the role on the current roster. Meniscus tears can easily keep a player out for three months (Goff is saying at least a month). In any case, DC is now in a real bind in central midfield, regardless of what kind of player we play alongside Clyde Simms. Most fans, myself included, seem to be agitating for a playmaker from abroad. Until that happens, however, it's high time to take a look at all the options we have on the roster, on trial, and even amongst the rumors out there.

Star-divide

To clarify this list, I'm just going down the roster by number. Once I hit the trialists and players we're rumored to be interested in, I'll be going in alphabetical order.

 

Floribert N'Galula: The word on Flo is that he was talked up as a potential Patrick Vieira clone while in Manchester United's youth setup. High praise, to be sure, but since those heady days N'Galula is said to have played just 2 senior club matches at Randers in Denmark before playing 12 times with the Sparta Rotterdam reserves. At his very young age, having few senior appearances doesn't make you a failure. However, it also makes you a pretty iffy answer to be thrust into a crucial starting role in a league you've never played in, and on a team that really needs the player in that position to succeed. On the plus side, Flo was still in the discussion for this position, along with Szetela and Santino Quaranta, before the injury (check the end of Goff's article on the first day of camp).

John DiRaimondo: Very recently, I had said that I thought it would be pretty hard for DiRaimondo to make the squad. Maybe not so much now. DiRaimondo is a classic tough-guy midfielder with a blistering shot that he occasionally puts to use (including the winning goal in last year's USL-2 championship game while on loan with the Richmond Kickers). However, DiRaimondo will never be confused with a midfield technician. His range of passing is pretty basic and he tries to stay within those confines.

Chris Pontius: Everyone at United said that Pontius would be staying up front and focusing on becoming a great forward as opposed to a good option all over the place. Still, we're looking at every option here, and Pontius did pretty well bursting from central midfield when called upon. I don't know if his vision and passing ability will be good enough to pick opponents apart, but he would not be a disaster here either. The trick would be how he takes to the position. If he tries to play like Javier Morales, it won't work because that's not his game. However, if he strives to imitate a guy like Stuart Holden by disrupting teams with his own runs more than his gifts as a passer, he could be an answer. However, the club is rightly going to use him as a striker, so this is more of an emergency provision than a realistic solution right now.

Devon McTavish: Like DiRaimondo, McTavish is a defensive midfielder who tries to keep the game simple. After winning the beep test, we at least can be sure he has the endurance to make life hard for opposing players for 90 minutes. However, it seems everyone's preference is for a guy that can make the attack go rather than a guy who will be mostly focused on defensive tasks.

Rodney Wallace: One of last year's pleasant surprises was seeing Wallace successfully adapt to a central role when called upon. It's not his best spot, but when the team needed a dynamic, abrasive presence when Olsen was being rested, Wallace did a good job. Like Pontius, though, the current plan has him playing elsewhere. If Wallace makes a short-term move to central midfield, Marc Burch will be recalled at left back (something that I don't find particularly appealing). As with most of the options discussed thus far, it also leaves us with 2 defensive midfielders in the middle (though Wallace is the most attack-minded of that group).

Brandon Barklage: Perhaps the most intriguing option, Barklage is the only other natural two-way central midfielder on the roster. He was something of a surprising success last season before he was unfortunate enough to suffer a torn ACL in the US Open Cup. This was a shame, because Barklage is the kind of all-action player this club could have used as a spark down the stretch last season. There are big questions about how fit he'll be following the surgery and lengthy rehab that comes with an ACL tear, but we do know that he'll fight, has a cannon of a shot, and makes quality runs forward. What I said about how Pontius should follow Holden's style of play is also applicable to Barklage.

Santino Quaranta: Tino has been in the discussion to start in this position throughout the offseason, and those calls will only get stronger. We all saw Quaranta filling in there in 2008 when Gallardo went down. While he was not brilliant, he was one of the few players truly engaged in finding a way to make that season work out. If nothing else, it was a commendable effort in pretty dire circumstances. Quaranta does have a decent range of passes and certainly has the creative spark necessary to do at least an adequate job. In my opinion, however, we'd be moving one of MLS's best right midfielders into a role he'd be fairly average in, and Tino's replacement on the right would probably be Boyzzz Khumalo (a decent sub, but not necessarily a starter-in-sub's-clothing).

Jaime Moreno: Any time this club has needed a player linking midfield and attack, there are always a group of DC fans saying it should be Moreno. The logic goes that he's got tremendous skill and creativity, so surely he can do the job further from goal. This is further bolstered by the fact that, back in the day and on rare occasions in recent times, #99 has slotted back into this role and done alright. However, I've always disagreed with it as anything other than a last-ditch move. Especially nowadays, putting Moreno in midfield and asking him to do the running necessary for the job seems like a waste of his valuable energy. When you have a forward with Moreno's talents, it seems like the smartest thing to do is let him play the more liberated role that a forward gets. He can wander around, feeling out the weak points of the opposing defense, and attack a certain player or gap. Moved back, he will lose that freedom and have to spend more time chasing opposing players, which will obviously mean he's on the field for even less time.

Matias Corujo: Who? If you blinked, you might have missed the mention he got a little while ago on Soccer Insider. Essentially, Corujo was offered up to United, and the club's interest was apparently quite mild. Corujo is an Uruguayan midfielder playing at home with Montevideo Wanderers. There was no word at the time where in the midfield Corujo is most comfortable, so it's quite the long shot. Still, we could see the club re-evaluate that offer now that our need is more severe.

Christian Gomez: You knew this was coming, right? Shatz's farewell piece turned into a debate as to whether this team still needed Gomez. With our most likely attacking midfielder out for some unknown period, the calls for Gomez's return will increase. I still think he's not the answer, though, because of the defensive requirements in the position. For us to bring Gomez back, we'd have to abandon the 442 temporarily or watch teams slice through us like a knife through butter. We'd also be signing a guy making well into the 6 figure range to fill a temporary need (and we'd have to cut someone else, as well). I know it's tempting, but so is that late night call from your crazy ex. You broke up for a reason.

Two-Boys Gumede: Everyone's favorite new name is an attacking midfield/forward (some would call him a "tweener" but I hate that word) currently on trial after surprisingly going undrafted. I won't pretend to know more about him than that. He's supposedly a creative midfielder, and that's what we need. He was a long shot to make the team, and probably still is, but his odds have perhaps gotten a bit better.

Daniel Wasson: My memory of Wasson was that he's got decent technique, but plays a pretty basic game in central midfield. He's not quite a full-out defensive midfielder, but he's also not a guy I'd call a box-to-box type either. I would assume his time in the 2.Bundesliga with since-relegated Osnabrück improved his game somewhat, even if only because there is more pressure to succeed in Europe. Wasson won't set hearts alight, but we could do worse.

From where I sit, the option that appeals most is probably Barklage (so long as his fitness is there) followed by shifting Quaranta inside for the time being and starting Khumalo (or Shipalane) on the right. Barklage reminds me of a lower-level version of everybody's favorite assistant coach, Ben Olsen. Both are smallish guys that fight like hell, cover tons of ground, and can shoot from outside the box. I don't think Barklage, at this time, should be our long term starter, but for right now I think he's the best choice on the evidence I've seen.

I would be willing to accept using Pontius there and starting Moreno with Allsopp up front, but only as a stopgap for the short term. N'Galula seems to be a serious option if the coaches and Kasper are mentioning him by name to Goff in the central midfield discussion, but he's a totally unknown quantity. Everyone else that came up is either probably not going to make the team (Gumede), clearly better elsewhere (Moreno), a bad fit for the formation (Gomez), or another defensive midfielder (the rest). I don't see a dual holding system generating the kind of offensive showing that Kevin Payne has publicly declared is part of DC United's identity. I know that we're just talking about a short-to-medium term solution, but I can hardly imagine an attack-minded coach like Onalfo wanting to make his first impression to United fans be a defensive approach.

Tweet Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Black And Red United

DC United lose to Colorado Rapids, continue to lack chemistry

May 2010 by Martin Shatzer - 11 comments

Scouting report: Colorado

May 2010 by ChestRockwell - 2 comments

DC United lose to FC Dallas, are back to normal

May 2010 by Martin Shatzer - 1 comment

Time for a change

May 2010 by Martin Shatzer - 12 comments

Around SB Nation

UFC 117: Anderson Silva vs. Chael Sonnen Predictions

Aug 2010 from Bloody Elbow - 77 comments

UFC 117 Preview: Rick Story, Dustin Hazelett Highlight Solid Mix of Undercard Action

Aug 2010 from Bloody Elbow - 12 comments

Comments

Display:

Can Olsen un-retire?

I’m starting to think that the front office still has something up its sleeve. Why would they let 4 central midfielders (Gomez, Olsen, Fred, Jacobson) leave the team without having a plan to add at least one?

Ever since I wrote my own piece on Rodney Wallace, I’ve been considering how a midfield of Quaranta-Simms-Wallace-Castillo would do. At the time it was because I didn’t trust Szetela to give more effort than he gave last year, but now this is looking like a distinct possibility. Neither Simms or Wallace is really the two-way creative player that we had in mind, but maybe thats ok. Between Simms’ defensive skills and play-reading ability, and Wallace’s speed and aggression, they would certainly do well to shut down the opposing team’s #10, and it would also allow Clyde to get forward more often. This isn’t our most preferred midfield, but I think it would work, especially if we pair Moreno with Pontius up top so we still have someone to organize and lead the attack.

Other than that though, we’ll have to wait and see how Barklage and Gumede do in camp.

by Martin Shatzer on Feb 5, 2025 6:39 AM EST reply actions  

443

What if we forego requiring a traditional A-mid in a 442 by using a 4-4-3? For the record I realize this would never happen but here is what I was thinking:

                         Allsopp
                Castillo Pontius
          Bark Flo/Simms Tino
Wallace James Jak Namoff/Simms

I think this formation would really benefit the top three guys in particular. I don’t see Pontius or Castillo as pure strikers but attacking from the flanks would really suit their strengths. It could also cause havoc with diagonal runs by Quaranta and Barkladge into the space behind Alsopp. I think we could conceivably get buckets of goals, even without an A-mid if we used this approach.

If N’Galula turns out to be a decent deep mid guy who can get forward, we would need to possibly find another spot for Simms. He might not be a bad option at right fullback. I thought about maybe putting Simms at Halfback and James out wide given the uncertainty around Namoff’s status but that probably isn’t the best idea based on how Simms performed at HB last year in a stop gap role. The other problem is that Simms and Flo aren’t exactly Xavi (who is?) and distribution out of the middle might prove problematic. Still I thought this was an interesting idea at the very least.

Based on Hicks’ innuendo in the statement above, perhaps an A-mid is on the way and this suggestion is even more unrealistic given the status quo…

by JaimeSegundo on Feb 5, 2025 10:21 AM EST reply actions  

I really like the 433 as an idea, but this DC team is an awkward fit into it. No matter how you approach it, you end up with a couple guys in positions that would not be their best or having to start guys that probably shouldn’t start. My team would feature Wallace in midfield and Burch at left back, if only because I’m not sure about Barklage’s left foot. Since I’ve spent a lot of time hammering on about how Burch shouldn’t start, you can see why I’d avoid a 433 with the current squad.

N’Galula may turn out to be a pleasant surprise, but with our recent history with young African players I’d be glad if he just stays aboard for the whole season. I am making no plans for a situation where Simms has lost his position. If N’Galula is that good, spectacular. It probably isn’t going to happen, though.

by ChestRockwell on Feb 5, 2025 2:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Woops! Meant to say 433 not 443.

Although being able to have eleven field players would be nice…

by JaimeSegundo on Feb 5, 2025 10:23 AM EST reply actions  

Too bad!

I had visions of MLS cup after MLS cup if we were able to consistently have 1 extra player on the field :)

by Irrlicht on Feb 5, 2025 11:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Defense Stop gap

If a short term solution is the way to go, it is wise to just play defensive for a month or 2 then go to the attacking style when Szetela returns? Is the total team stronger playing 2 defensive midfielders due to the personal available? Just hold down the fort until the squad returns to full strength. If so, I think Payne and Onalfo need to put there ideology aside in favor a pragmatic solution in the short term.

by srock258 on Feb 5, 2025 11:36 AM EST reply actions  

That’s the thing about ideology. If you put it aside easily, it becomes just a mild preference.

Will the team be best served by going with 2 defensive midfielders? It may well be. When Soehn used such a formation to stop the bleeding in 2008, Simms seemed comfortable enough with it. However, on this team you are rolling the dice a bit to use it. N’Galula is unproven, DiRaimondo and McTavish are pretty limited, Wallace is needed elsewhere, and Wasson isn’t even on the team yet. Those are big caveats.

There’s also the mental side to this. When you switch to the 2 defensive midfielder, grind it out 442, you need to have the right mix of gritty, mean-spirited players that will go through hell to keep the opponent scoreless. I look through this team, and I don’t know if we have that. Is Allsopp willing to run himself into the ground knowing that he’ll rarely get the chance to do anything concerning goalscoring? Castillo did pretty well with El Salvador’s super-disciplined 4231, but that was with national pride on the line; how will he do given similar responsibilities at his 9 to 5? Since Nowak left, this team has very rarely showed the kind of intensity (that borders on being overzealous) required to make this truly reliable. Oddly enough, most of those games happened to be against Chicago, who we’ve pretty much owned for the past 2 years. Other than that and our trip to Toluca (in which we attacked intelligently enough to keep them honest, rather than bunkering down), ferocious intensity is not a common sight in our neck of the woods.

My preference of Barklage is in part based on the idea that our team is still built to win games by attacking. Barklage won’t go out and dominate games, but he will fit the role well enough for the team to play a quality version of the style of play we’re set up for. However, it’s a narrow decision; if Barklage isn’t fully fit, I’d probably go with Wallace there and recall Burch at left back. The more I think about Quaranta, the more I want to keep him in his best spot and try to emphasize our strengths rather than spend all our time papering over the cracks.

by ChestRockwell on Feb 5, 2025 2:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Lack of depth

Our midfield by committee plan is already showing problems. None of our CMs are genuine fits for the role. Quaranta is still hurting and better on the right anyway. Pontius needs to be left up top to develop. Wallace is a nice role player, but in the midfield he would be best playing the spot that Simms already plays decently. Szetela was a stretch to play in the middle anyway. And again, he would probably be better suited to the defensive mid role we already have covered. The Africans? We’ll see. My guess is that If they could play, they’d be playing elsewhere. Jaime? Sure, eight years ago. Now? Get real. The rest of our lot are all of the same ilk. Guys better suited to the USL than running a championship-calibre MLS team. We are not in good shape because this plan is ill-conceived. Look, I don’t want to see another Gallardo either, but you need the kind of quality in the midfield to compete we lack right now. Do you want to face that fact now or next October?

The most composed player on on the ball on our team, the one who might be able to add a very interesting dimension alongside a Quaranta or a Pontius in the midfield, is Jakovic. But I don’t know that he has ever played there or would ever be given the opportunity. I also dread to think what our backline would be like without him.

But this is where we are as a team. The question is where are we going to go?

by rcdwriting on Feb 5, 2025 2:51 PM EST reply actions  

One question that will need to be answered is whether Onalfo adapts his formation to his available personnel, or if he picks one formation and sticks with it no matter what. If its the former, then we have several interesting possibilities. If its the latter, then we’re probably stuck with Barklage or DiRaimondo (or N’Galula if he surprises us all).

by Martin Shatzer on Feb 5, 2025 4:33 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

That’s a very good point. In KC, Onalfo only left the 442 with in-game subs. I can’t remember reading a single lineup there that was not a 442 at the start. However, that was in part because the team was assembled to play that formation. There weren’t any compelling reasons to change to something else. They didn’t have the right guys to play with a back 3 full time (though they very often tried to turn losses into draws and draws into wins by going 343 for the last half hour of games), and they didn’t have a playmaker good enough to make a 4231 really work. Onalfo came into a squad best off in a 442 and stuck with it.

Here in DC, it might be more of the same. Looking at the roster, it seems to me that we were and are still set up to play 442 most easily. How that formation is implemented (diamond, flat, narrow, box, etc) is another matter.

by ChestRockwell on Feb 5, 2025 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Barklage was beginning to impress me last year before his injury. It was too bad - he was just starting to build up his confidence. I’m eager to see him this year to see if he comes into the season strong. I think he’s in the mix for a lot of minutes this year.

by Matt Mathai on Feb 5, 2025 5:02 PM EST reply actions  

Disturbing thought

Perhaps it’s only because work is beating me up, but I’m having a rather disquieting thought. I have a nagging fear that we’ve seen the last of Bryan Namoff in our uniform. Six months is a long time to have to rehab from a concussion. Worse, even if he does come back, he’s going to be in rather fragile shape, given how concussions tend to become more frequent and more damaging when repeated.

if he can’t come back, I wouldn’t mind seeing Simms tried out there. He doesn’t have Vaughn’s passing or pace, but we know he can tackle and we know he can run all day.

by Matt Mathai on Feb 5, 2025 5:05 PM EST reply actions  

Namoff’s health is the elephant in the room. It seems like no one wants to discuss it because we all fear the worst (especially after seeing Gros have to hang it up far too early).

If the worst case becomes reality, then the job is probably Vaughn’s to lose. McTavish will provide good competition, though. He played there in college, and he has the physical attributes you’d want in a right back. He’s proven to be a stable player in defensive roles as long as he’s not having to be a center back. I was always a little puzzled about Soehn’s refusal to use McTavish there when Namoff was being rested.

I am personally against moving Simms away from defensive midfield unless we sign someone for that spot that’s as good or better than he is. It’s the worst of both worlds: Simms hasn’t shown that he’s a good fit in the back, and we compromise our ability to protect the back four with our midfield. I can see why people want to keep that option open; Simms could just need some solid time to adapt to the position. I’m just very big on keeping people in their best position unless it’s absolutely necessary to move them (hence my reticence about moving Quaranta into the middle).

by ChestRockwell on Feb 5, 2025 6:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I think Vaughn becomes the inheritor of the RB spot should Bryan be unable to return. I’m just curious if he’s durable enough. I like his game, and I’m glad we picked him up. McTavish can play there too. Maybe it’s just a personal bias but I have a hard time seeing him as a starter - he just feels like a utility, fill-in guy to me. That’s probably unfair to him.

I definitely agree that Simms’ best spot is DM, and that the team is best served by keeping him there.

Not having seen any of our new guys play, I don’t have a feel for whether or not any of them could slide out to play wide. We’ll know more soon enough.

by Matt Mathai on Feb 5, 2025 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

A center mid

Good comprehensive article Chest. But, it serves to emphasizes the key point:
NONE of the above will do.
Not one of the players mentioned is ready to play the most important position for a winning DCU. Not one is even remotely proven or promising…except Gomez and we all know he has gone down hill, unfortunately.
 We need management to put up the dough for a proven international acquisition.
When did DCU, with the second best attendance in the league become so CHEAPO.
If Chang and Payne want fan support they need to support us!
Go get a good center mid. If they are not actually looking now, they are giving up on this season and the franchise, or they are broke.

by mikelem on Feb 6, 2025 1:13 PM EST reply actions  

It’s all well and good to demand a playmaker as we’re all doing, but we’re spending a lot of Will Chang’s money in doing so. You want to know when DC got cheap? Well, combine Gallardo and Emilio’s DP deals with the fact that we’re still getting reamed by the city at RFK, and you’re more or less at your answer. We’ve done the DP thing twice, and it has not ended well in either case. Meanwhile, the club is losing money with every single game at home. I believe Chang when he says that he wants to create an ownership structure like the one he’s involved in with the San Francisco Giants. It’s familiar, and with that kind of money familiar is good. However, I also believe part of the reason is to spread the cost of running this team (which includes DP signings) around. With multiple owners, we had 2 DPs; with just one owner, we shipped our remaining DP out of town. These are not coincidences.

Also, for what it’s worth, we don’t have the 2nd best attendance. Seattle, LA, Toronto, Houston, and RSL all had more than us (in part because our attendance dropped by like 3000 this past offseason).

Things aren’t so absolute as either DC signing a brilliant playmaker or “they are giving up on the season and the franchise”. It could well be that they can’t find a player that’s good enough that will also have a good chance of adapting to MLS (which means the culture, the long travel, the less-than-grand lodgings on the road, the fact that there won’t be another player breathing down a star’s neck for playing time, etc). It could also be that they’ve found such a guy, but he won’t be available until the summer (see: Gomez, 2004). It’s not like there’s a playmaker store that they can walk in, put down a few hundred grand, and it’s done. This is delicate business, and more often than not in the DP era these signings have been failures rather than successes.

by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2025 5:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation fan blog in support of D.C. United!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Where in Ft. Lauderdale is training camp?
Dsc00683_small
Strikers???
Dsc00683_small
Supplemental draft
Fedora_small
SuperDraft SuperConjecture SuperFuntime!
What, If Anything, Does The MSA Report Tell Us About A New D.C. United Stadium?
Happyhanukkah_small
Danny Allsopp goes waltzing Matilda

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SBNation.com Recent Stories

+1 updates

Fedor Vs. Silva Results: Press Conference And Post-Fight Notes

+2 updates

Villanova Vs. Pitt: Panthers Hang On For 57-54 Win At The Pavillion

Photo +14 updates

Strikeforce: Fedor Emelianenko Vs. Antonio Silva Results And Live Play-By-Play

More from SBNation.com >


Managers

Martin2_small Martin Shatzer

Authors

Hbsc_small ChestRockwell

Fedora_small The AMT