A Proposal For Tom Soehn
Hey Tommy. Have we got a deal for you!?
Remember all those great players you had when you were Head Coach of D.C. United? Remember when you converted Marc Burch from a forward to a defender? Genius!
Now that you're the Director of Soccer Operations for the Vancouver Whitecaps, you'll be tasked with assembling a new roster of MLS talent to compete in the 2011 season. You might even want to think about acquiring some of your old players.
Here's our proposal: Take all of them!
Just because you couldn't make it as a coach here with this roster doesn't mean you shouldn't take another shot with it.
We'd be willing to trade you the entire 2010 United roster for the rights to pick 10 new players via expansion draft, along with the No. 1 overall draft choice of course. This is a win-win. You get a pre-assembled team capable of at least a 66-minute performance each week, and we get the opportunity to start from scratch.
Is this really such a bad idea? If the Philadelphia Union can finish ahead of United in 2010 as an expansion club, then maybe being an expansion club ourselves would give us a better chance at winning.
No, I'm not serious. I've got too much of an emotional attachment to too many of these players to actually want something like this to happen.
But I am starting to come around to Chest's point of view from almost two months ago.
We talked Saturday night about how D.C. United really only had three players in that match that are an important part of our future. In the comments section, we expanded that list to seven (or maybe eight if Dejan Jakovic can quit making crucial mistakes every week). Other than those seven or eight guys, there's no one else on our roster that we can't live without. And keep in mind that two of the eight guys we named are Andy Najar and Bill Hamid - Homegrown players who don't need to be protected from the expansion draft.
So when we're debating between putting Stephen King or Jordan Graye on the final protection list, and the team decides to go in a different direction, don't fret. Neither of them are likely to be critical pieces in our rise back to the top. And take heart, because that will mean that our 2010 season is over.
Tweet
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh yeah
Just please let us keep Andy. Thanks!
xoxo
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekend Writer for SBNation DC.
by Martin Shatzer on Sep 28, 2025 7:47 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Still remember
Watching the Carolina Challenge Cup during the preseason and thinking how nice it was that DCU was giving one of the academy products an opportunity to have a run out with the big boys in the preseason. How things have changed…
by Irrlicht on Sep 28, 2025 12:39 PM EDT reply actions
Defensive players
I don’t think it is a coincidence that we haven’t won a championship since 2004. By the way 2004 is the last year we had Ryan Nelsen as our CB. Even when we were winning the supporters shield in 2006 - 2007, we got bumped in the first round (grrr Chicago). Why? Defensive lapses, defensive struggles, and defensive disorganization. Everybody harps on the fact that we cannot score goals and that we need a striker or creative playmaker, but no amount of offense makes up for a bad defense, and we have pursued those options already and what has it done for us? I for one would like to see United do something radically different for 2011: focus on defense. * please note that this does not mean bringing in over-the-hill has beens that cannot play anymore (I am looking at you Talley and co).
by DCUFaninMissouri on Sep 29, 2025 4:45 PM EDT reply actions
I don’t know, maybe defense has been on my mind since watching the debacle that is the 3 - 4 Skins defense this season.
by DCUFaninMissouri on Sep 29, 2025 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Agree and disagree
Under Soehn, our problems were clearly defensive. We had a weak foundation, yet sent men forward with wild abandon. Teams figured us out and would just sit in, waiting to break forward once we lost the ball with too many people forward. Our team speed was low, so you could be pretty certain that we wouldn’t be able to recover in time to help much. However, if we had spent some money defensively, we’d have been able to do better with lower numbers. That’s the thing with attacking teams: The good ones are always strong in the back, particularly in the middle. You’re going to be leaving your defenders with lower numbers than normal on a frequent basis, so you better make sure they’re good enough to get by with less help.
Where I disagree is the idea that pursuing forwards or playmakers should take a back seat because it hasn’t worked recently. The idea to sign a striker, for example, was completely reasonable. Where we went wrong was the execution of that idea (Allsopp simply isn’t good enough to be anything but our 4th choice guy making $40K, and that’s assuming he can fill that role better than Cristman). In fact, all of our moves in this past offseason were reasonable if you look at them strictly in terms of positional need and player profile. The problem with virtually all of them was that the players signed simply weren’t good enough. We needed a physical, out-and-out striker, a left winger, and a veteran center back. Allsopp, Cristian Castillo, and Juan Manuel Pena fit those descriptions, but none of the three was good enough at those jobs. Our inability to spot quality players overrides any concern about whether we should focus on position A or position B.
Also, I think our 2007 playoff loss had a whole lot more to do with losing Moreno and Emilio to injuries on the eve of the playoffs than anything else. I don’t know if we had what it took to be a championship team (our form began to drop after the All Star break), but we lost to Chicago because we couldn’t get any offense going. With Moreno out and Emilio managing just an hour on an ankle he probably shouldn’t have even been walking on, the Fire had nothing to worry about defensively because we had no cutting edge. It’s no coincidence that Christian Gomez looked like he was doing all of our attacking by himself (he was). That team had Bobby Boswell in good form, experienced players like Bryan Namoff, Mike Petke, and Brandon Prideaux on either side of him, and Troy Perkins was playing much better than he is now. We just had injuries at the absolute worst time.
by ChestRockwell on Sep 30, 2025 8:03 AM EDT up reply actions
So if the organization did well in identifying our needs in general, but did a terrible job of evaluating talent in their new acquisitions, then the Technical Director probably needs to be demoted.
Oh wait, he already was.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekend Writer for SBNation DC.
by Martin Shatzer on Sep 30, 2025 3:07 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions

by Martin Shatzer on 






