D.C. United Lose To Columbus Crew, Fail To Record A Shot On Target
I'm not a statistical wiz or a tactical genius by any means. But there's a couple things that I've figured out about soccer.
1. You have to score goals to win games.
2. You have to shoot the ball to score goals.
D.C. United didn't do any of that tonight. Not a single shot on goal for the home team tonight.
Crazy things can happen when you shoot the ball. The ball could go in the net. Your team could get a rebound. Or the goalkeeper could even make a gaffe (as we learned tonight).
Gabriel Desjardins, who writes the SB Nation hockey blog Behind The Net, has done some excellent research on soccer statistics in MLS. I don't understand his numbers entirely (I'm sure Dave will elaborate later if necessary), but the basic premise is that the more a team shoots, the more a team scores. Makes sense, right?
The common theme tonight was United gathering possession, moving the ball into the Columbus Crew's third, dribbling towards the box, and turning the ball over. They never got off that final shot.
Obviously the team is flawed, and it doesn't look like Ben Olsen will have much time left to adjust those flaws.

Santino Quaranta was very active tonight for United. He had several quality crosses from the left side and made some strong runs up the middle to create scoring chances. But he passed up on shots far too often to try to set up a teammate or take one more dribble closer to the net.

Julius James and Jed Zayner each stood out to me as having good nights defensively. Holding a really talented team to only one goal is not a bad accomplishment.
The early mistake by Bill Hamid turned out to be very costly. He caved under the high pressure from Guillermo Barros Schelotto, giving away the ball, the goal, and the match. To his credit though, it was the only clear mistake that Hamid has made in his professional career.
Danny Allsopp was another player guilty of failing to produce enough quality scoring opportunities. He was never quite able to get himself into scoring position, and was sometimes far too slow in transition when United should have been counterattacking.
***
United held the two-time Supporters' Shield winners and the favorites to win it again this year to only one goal in a fairly even match. That's nothing to cry about. But what I find truly disappointing is that Olsen and United balanced their roster very specifically to able to compete in this tough three-match week.
And yet they still lost all three matches.
Tweet
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
“We have an obligation to our fans, this organization, and the players that built it to fight each and every game. No one is laying this thing down.”
That’s the guy who wore the armband tonight. After that crap team effort, giving him a 3 in light of this is awful generous, but part of this is the emotion (and booze) from the last few hours.
"#DCU is like senior prom. A bunch of people standing around waiting for a 17-year old to score."
by Bald Pollack on Sep 4, 2025 11:22 PM EDT reply actions
Leadership aside...
Quaranta was excellent last night, especially in the first half. He looked like an All-Star again. But you’re right that the others weren’t on the same page. And maybe he is partially to blame for that, as the captain.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekend Writer for SBNation DC.
by Martin Shatzer on Sep 5, 2025 9:51 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Wow!
I am surprised that we did not have a shot on goal. I certainly did not get the sense that we were zero in that category by the flow of the game. Sure our attack looked anemic at times, and let’s not even go there about Hamid’s gaffe, but we didn’t look that bad did we?
by DCUFaninMissouri on Sep 5, 2025 4:24 PM EDT reply actions
8 shots, 0 on goal
What makes it frustrating is that King and Quaranta both passed up chances early in the second half from inside the box where shooting was the glaringly obvious choice. Since that near miss a few weeks ago (against Seattle? Can’t remember, but it was late), King appears to be totally lacking in any belief that he should shoot. That’s a far cry from the guy at Maryland who seemed to be good for 3 or 4 dangerous shots a game. He has the ability, but his confidence appears so low that , even if he did choose to shoot, it would probably go poorly.
Columbus looked pretty poor by their standard, but our attacks generally petered out due to either a lack of confidence, a lack of ability, or a poor decision. Throw in a couple of timely blocks from the Crew and Allsopp’s early missed header (from an absolutely perfect cross from Quaranta), and there you have it.
I don’t think we necessarily played so badly that we didn’t deserve some shots on goal, but teams that lack belief tend to have nights like this. We’re going to have to overcome that mental block if we’re going to beat anyone.
by ChestRockwell on Sep 6, 2025 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions
How About A 4-5-1?
With the one forward being Najar. Put Bosko as the number 10 in front of King and Simms (who knows how bad Morsink is hurt), with Tino and McTavish (or Wallace if he ever gets back) on the wings and feed Najar.
by dc army on Sep 5, 2025 9:41 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Choir
I suggested the same a few months ago. However, they’re such a mess that they just don’t seem capable of doing anything differently.
by Croftonpost on Sep 7, 2025 3:40 PM EDT reply actions

by Martin Shatzer on 







