Reading The Tea Leaves: Could DC United Be Angling For The #1 Pick?
Every MLS offseason sees a dormant period that ends about two weeks before the SuperDraft. As we're smack dab in the middle of the period where the rumors start flying, I think it's high time we start looking at some of the rumors and how they pertain to us. The chances of DC United making a trade or three in the very near future seems high to me, as Ben Olsen appears to be taking a very proactive approach to constructing his squad. Playing it safe does not appear to be fashionable at RFK these days; could you imagine former coach Curt Onalfo engineering the trade that brought us Dax McCarty in exchange for Rodney Wallace?
With that in mind, it's time to try to guess our next move. Given my Joseph Ngwenya premonition in the Re-Entry Draft, I've been feeling awfully full of myself this offseason. I suppose repeatedly testing my luck will eventually make me look silly, but until then it's time to live it up. Currently, there are four recent articles that have me thinking:
1. Ben Olsen believes that any player taken in the first few picks overall should be able to step in and play immediately.
2. After the Perkins trade, Steve Goff said there was a chance that we'd trade other big names as well.
3. Goff also quoted Kevin Payne as saying DC was likely to draft an attacking player with the #3 pick.
4. The Vancouver Whitecaps think Darlington Nagbe will be taken with the #1 pick, but they have not ruled out trading that pick away.
Bear with me here as I attempt to parse these rumors and quotes into one coherent sequence of moves that probably won't happen, but isn't out of the question.
The various statements coming from Olsen and Payne leave me thinking that the most likely scenario in the first round of the draft is that we take Indiana striker Will Bruin with the third pick. He fits Olsen's description of someone that would be ready to contribute real minutes right away, and obviously a target forward would fulfill Payne's prediction of our pick being offense-first. The reason I say Bruin here is that someone like Omar Salgado, at 17, is seen by pretty much everyone as a project that could be a big star down the road rather than a guy we call on regularly throughout 2011. Unless Salgado is further along as a player than anyone expects, statements like Olsen's point to United thinking of ability today rather than tomorrow (though if we do take Salgado, and he is ready to start immediately, we will have something truly special on our hands).
That's the boring prediction. A far more interesting (though much less likely) possibility would see DCU make an aggressive play for either Nagbe or his fellow Akron Zip, defensive midfielder Perry Kitchen. These two appear to be the players getting the most "can't miss" talk out of this year's draft pool. They're also the only players we probably won't have access to at our current position; the standard logic is that Nagbe will go to the Vancouver Whitecaps and that Kitchen will be selected by the Portland Timbers. However, when you have Vancouver, a team with another pick in the first half of the first round, not publicly saying that they will take a specific player this close to the draft, it means they are very much open to making a deal. As "out of left field" as it sounds, I think the door is at least slightly open.
Here's how it would go down: On the day before the draft, United and Vancouver announce a trade. Vancouver sends the #1 pick to DC, in exchange for one of the following:
1. Clyde Simms and our #3 pick (Vancouver would likely have to sweeten the deal with another draft pick or some cash here; otherwise, it could be a straight up Simms-for-#1 pick deal, giving us two of the first three picks in the draft).
2. Our #3 pick and either allocation money or some combination of our other, later picks
3. Chris Pontius (here again, we might see the our first rounder and something else from Vancouver involved).
In the first scenario, DC would then take Kitchen (a player we're rumored to really like) with the #1 pick. Kitchen would become the likely starter at defensive midfield straight away. One strike against this move would be that Kitchen is not an attacking player, but if we trade Simms we obviously need to get someone that can start ahead of Kurt Morsink. From Vancouver's end, Simms would fill a need because their current midfield is full of two-way guys like John Thorrington and Terry Dunfield and lacks a full-on defensive midfielder (as versatile youngster Philippe Davies may find himself in a wide role or in the back four). Tom Soehn, now in their front office, was always quite fond of Simms to boot.
The other two scenarios would see us take Nagbe at #1, which makes all of the rumors tie together. There is also the outside chance that we'd take Nagbe in the first scenario, provided we've already spotted a new defensive midfielder abroad and are in the process of signing him up. Nagbe would come in and be expected to have an impact similar to that of Danny Mwanga in Philadelphia this past season.
The second scenario seems the most unlikely, since Vancouver has plenty of allocation money and draft picks. I doubt they'd have much interest in trading down to get something they already have enough of. However, perhaps the Whitecaps covet someone other than Nagbe and are sure he'll still be on the board after Portland goes second. Like I said, it's unlikely, but it's not entirely out of the realm of possibility.
The "trade Pontius" scenario would mean taking Nagbe becomes a stone-cold lock. While there aren't many United fans that would relish trading away a player like Pontius, there is also the fact that he might not fit into any particular spot in the starting lineup. As a forward, he's not the sharpest finisher; as a winger, he'd run into competition from Najar and club captain Santino Quaranta (the handful of DC fans that dislike Quaranta are vocal,but there's no chance Tino is riding the pine if he's healthy). I think Pontius is a good player with the potential to be spectacular, but the rumor of us shopping him around means we have to at least consider why United would be willing to move him. The Whitecaps, for their trouble, would get a player that would undoubtedly start somewhere for them and, like Simms, a guy that Soehn is very familiar with.
So, faithful readers...what do you think? Am I crazy, or drunk (I'm not, but I'm also only about three hours away from enjoying a delicious Brooklyn Black Chocolate Stout)? Do any of these potential deals work for you as a fan of either club?
Tweet
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Another possibility
Jakovic is surely an option
by littlenerrie on Jan 6, 2026 3:16 PM EST reply actions
Intriguing
I can see the possibility of trading Jakovic (with White coming in, our hunt for a veteran, and the fact that in 2010 Jakovic plateaued when he should have grown significantly), that rumor isn’t out there. It’s not an existing rumor from a reliable source, but the Whitecaps would surely prefer Jakovic, with his potential, over Janicki. With DeMerit in place, Jakovic would be able to be a supporting defender rather than the brains of the back four as he is here. Maybe that’s the issue.
I’ve got to say, as much as I love Jakovic’s combination of speed, size, and comfort with the ball, I would be perfectly fine with a Jakovic-for-#1 pick trade. James is more reliable, and we’re looking to find a veteran starter from abroad. If Jakovic isn’t starting, then getting the #1 pick for him would be a steal.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 6, 2026 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
Jakovic
I’m actually surprised that the names Pontius and Simms came up in trade rumors before Jakovic. Jakovic seems like more of the anti-Olsen. He’s got great physical traits, but it was his decision making that was really poor in 2010. That kind of play has no place in the Army.
But if trading Jakovic was being considered, I’ve got to think we would have selected Conrad in the RED2.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekend Writer for SBNation DC.
by Martin Shatzer on Jan 6, 2026 4:05 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
You've got to believe that Jakovic being Canadian
Would be appealing to Vancouver as well.
by Brendanukkah on Jan 6, 2026 4:24 PM EST up reply actions
Not really
Canadian teams don’t have a quota anymore, so getting Canadians isn’t necessarily a priority.
by jason1551 on Jan 6, 2026 10:08 PM EST up reply actions
Another thought I had later in the day
Perhaps working with Onstad, who appears set to be something like a defensive coordinator for us, will help Jakovic along. If Onstad can help Jakovic cut out the avoidable mistakes, he has the tools to become the kind of guy that could contend for a Best 11 spot.
Trading away Jakovic would present a problem, and that would be the defensive depth you bring up. Whoever the new guy is would be first choice, and James would battle White for the other starting role. After that, we’d be looking at moving guys like Burch or McTavish there, and that’s proven to be an undesirable option. With 30 roster spots, we should have more than 3 center backs that we could field in a league match without knowing it will automatically be a problem.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 6, 2026 9:36 PM EST up reply actions
Depends
Both Kitchen and Shanosky are capable of playing CB. Could be that one or the other competes for a spot there. There’s also the possible loan of Brasesco who can play both CB and RB. Add in a few trialists or supplemental picks, and there could be some healthy competition across the backline.
I will mention that there quite a few people who think White will be a starter by the end of the season, so the possibility of trading Jakovic isn’t nearly as crazy as it sounds now.
by jason1551 on Jan 6, 2026 10:12 PM EST up reply actions
If we could make the deal to swap first round picks with Vancouver and ship Partyboy for their top pick in the second round, I’d take it. I’m as big a Pontius fan as anybody, but if Nagbe is as good as they say, and we can parlay another decent pick, it looks real good to me.
by The AMT on Jan 6, 2026 4:40 PM EST up reply actions
And, hell, if we could get their other first round pick (instead of the second rounder), it’s a downright no-brainer.
by The AMT on Jan 6, 2026 4:48 PM EST up reply actions
I’ve only seen Jakovic with the Canadian national team, but I’ve seen him a lot with the Canadian national team and I saw him good enough that I’d trade the #1 for Jakovic straight up.
Manager at Vancouver Whitecaps and western Canadian soccer website Eighty Six Forever and infrequently-posting flunky at Edmonton Oilers blog The Copper & Blue.
by Benjamin Massey on Jan 7, 2026 2:31 AM EST up reply actions
You've got yourself a deal
Let’s take this to the decision makers at our respective clubs so they can finish off the paperwork.
Seriously though, I can see how Jakovic playing his best would be worth the #1 pick. If I could be sure that he’ll live up to his potential in 2011, I wouldn’t be open to trading him. When he’s in form, the sky’s the limit for him.
It’s just when he starts hanging on to the ball for too long, and all the sudden he’ll go on a run where he’s directly responsible for a goal against in 4 or 5 games in a row. The coach who figures out how to minimize those things will have a top-notch starter on their hands.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 7, 2026 10:54 AM EST up reply actions
Agreed
Of course I’m working with theory as well, but that’s exactly the mental process I went through, except I only have one issue with it. We have players that consistently run into a sophomore slumps/injuries with DCU. This being James’ second full season with, I can see DC’s ‘luck’ having an effect here. Consider me superstitious.
by littlenerrie on Jan 6, 2026 3:58 PM EST reply actions
Interesting
I wouldn’t be surprised to see any of these play out. The building of Olsen’s Army makes for an interesting off-season.
But… as someone who isn’t able to follow the college scene, is Kitchen really that valuable that we’d jump through hoops to trade him for Simms? Surely there’s some risk there — though Simms is not flashy, he is solid and dependable. To essentially swap him for an untested rookie seems a little rash, especially if the cost to do so is high. Kitchen would have to be an upgrade right out of the box. But maybe Kitchen is, as reported, that good.
I like the Pontius deal better. Though I like the guy and think he’s got great potential, the risk would be much lower to swap him for Nagbe. Pontius’ position is easily covered (his strengths fairly redundant with Quranta’s), and we really need the help up top.
As for Jakovic, you make a good case, but I wouldn’t be so quick to let him go. Last year’s disaster made some good players look bad, but I can’t forget what a huge upgrade he was when we first brought him on board. I don’t think that he’s plateaued just yet, and I think Jak’s upside is much higher than James’.
Of course, what we don’t know is key — it all depends on those mysterious foreign prospects that have yet to enter the rumor mill.
by rke on Jan 6, 2026 4:04 PM EST reply actions
Possible defensive midfield signing from elsewhere
At the end of last season, Payne said he wanted to solidify the team’s defensive midfield. At the time, I took that to mean that we’d be adding a capable 2nd choice who could back up Simms or possibly play alongside him if we opted for a 5 man midfield. Maybe the idea is that we have someone better than Simms in the pipeline, and we’d grab Kitchen to be our oft-used backup.
As for what we’d gain trading Simms to grab Kitchen, the main thing would be getting younger and saving some cap room (Kitchen is GA, so we’d cut 6 figures off our cap number). I don’t know if Kitchen can be as good as Simms right away, but I think he will end up being better than Simms down the road. We might be weakened in the short term, but if he’s playing alongside McCarty it’s not as big a problem as it would be with last year’s team.
With Jakovic, I’m not necessarily endorsing giving him up; plenty depends on what Olsen and Onstad can do with him, as well as whether or not we sign another center back. I do think that Jakovic hit a plateau last year, but that is by no means a permanent condition. It could be something like what happened with Boswell before we traded him. You’re right that, if both players are playing their absolute best, Jakovic is better than James; really, it wouldn’t even be close. What worries me with Jakovic is that James plays much closer to his best on a regular basis, whereas we never know which Jakovic we’re going to get.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 6, 2026 9:44 PM EST up reply actions
Nagbe or Bruin
Excellent thoughts. I guess it all depends on how highly we rate Will Bruin compared to Darlington Nagbe. If we rate them close, I don’t see us making the trade up and giving up Pontius. But if we think Nagbe is a sure thing, I could see it happening. I personally rate Nagbe very high, but I’m no experienced scout. Just a fan. Najar and Nagbe hooking up to score goals makes me tingly with excitement. Just sayin… And like you said, and others have seconded, the Simms for Kitchen deal seems very unlikely, unless Kitchen is really that good.
by madavis on Jan 6, 2026 4:13 PM EST reply actions
Hernandez
I know we cannot trade him but will he figure in to our attack at all this year. I don’t see anyone even mentioning him in any posts. I know he didn’t score but he an Boskovic had some chemistry last year
by ashevillain on Jan 6, 2026 9:12 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Forgotten man
I’ll admit, I’ve forgotten or short-changed Hernandez in considering how our team will look in 2011, and that’s a mistake. Olsen seemed to like him in spite of his non-scoring (which I have always suspected was more about confidence than anything else; with a fresh start, he could well be the player we thought we were getting last year).
On the other hand, it’s tricky to see where he fits in. Wolff and Ngwenya both prefer to play off a lead striker, and Hernandez plays so deep he’s almost an attacking midfielder. Pairing him with either of our new guys would most likely be an awkward match. Assuming we find a competent (or hopefully more than competent) striker from abroad, Hernandez has even more competition. There’s also Pontius to consider, assuming he stays.
This is a tricky group to fit together. At the moment, we could be looking at a situation where starting jobs up front come down to who shot well in the last practice before game day.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 6, 2026 9:48 PM EST up reply actions
Hernandez is on a loan deal
It wouldn’t be that absurd to think that his loan deal gets cut early if he doesn’t perform within expectations (think Castillo in 2010).
by jason1551 on Jan 6, 2026 10:15 PM EST reply actions
The other reasoning behind that is that Hernandez is a rather large cap hit ($250K), so it could be a move to make if the team has someone else targeted.
by jason1551 on Jan 6, 2026 10:16 PM EST up reply actions
Goff says Hernandez has been let go
Article on our front page in a few minutes.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 7, 2026 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
I'm psychic
My next prediction is that Simms will be traded in some kind of deal for the #1 pick and that DC will somehow maintain the #3 pick.
by jason1551 on Jan 7, 2026 3:49 PM EST reply actions
So, Kitchen and Bruin/Salgado? Or Nagbe and Valentin/Sarkodie?
by The AMT on Jan 7, 2026 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
Kitchen and Bruin. The team gains the top midfielder and the 2nd best forward after Nagbe. Kitchen could start by the beginning of the season, while Bruin would get heavy rotation in the line-up. Sarkodie or Valentin would have been my second choice, but the pending addition of Brasesco limits the immediate need for either player.
Salgado’s not even in the discussion, IMO. He could drop quite a bit, as teams are looking for help now rather than a prospect that could take years to develop. His recent showing in the U20 scrimmagedidn’t help matters. I imagine that he would have to have a pretty good combine to even move into the top five.
by jason1551 on Jan 7, 2026 6:19 PM EST reply actions
Salgado not attending the Combine
You’re right that Salgado could fall out of the top 5. I wouldn’t be shocked. But I don’t think that United will pass on him just because he may have disappointed in U20 camp this week. United got a first hand look at Salgado for two weeks in November. We can only guess whether they liked him or not when he was training at RFK, but I’m pretty sure they’ve already made up their minds on him and nothing this week will really change Olsen’s opinion.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekend Writer for SBNation DC.
by Martin Shatzer on Jan 8, 2026 2:07 PM EST up reply actions
I'm a movin' on up, to the top...
Tom Soehn must be relishing having something that Payne and Kasper covet. I know he is a technical director for Vancouver, but I’m sure he would like nothing more than to see the Whitecaps fleece United.
I think a trade with the Whitecaps would require Simms and the #3 pick for the #1 slot, honestly. I’m not sure we could keep the #3 or even get the #8 pick in return, for Simms or Pontius, but either of those scenarios would be great from my perspective.
If Seattle doesn’t want to deal, going after the second pick wouldn’t be a bad idea either. I am 50/50 on the Kitchen vs. Nagbe debate, and we could possibly get either with the #2 pick. The prospects of a formation where we have five midfielders with Najar playing high on the right flank and Nagbe playing high on the left flank in support of a yet to be named forward would be great. If we could somehow keep the third pick, I wouldn’t be opposed to taking Nagbe AND Bruin either, since we now have White and Brasesco on the way and Shanosky could be in the mix for CB as well. Shanosky may make Nagbe a bigger target than Kitchen as well, since he presumably isn’t too far away from being able to hold down the defensive mid slot that would presumably be vacated by Simms.
I love ‘Easy’ Clyde and think he has been our most consistent presence over the last few years, but his injuries in the groin department due to serious wear and tear from all the minutes he has logged are of concern.
Ultimately, the pick we target will depend on whether Portland or Vancouver bite on Pontius or Simms, as well. If we lose Pontius, it wouldn’t make sense to go after Kitchen, and vice versa.
by JaimeSegundo on Jan 8, 2026 10:56 AM EST reply actions
Something else to chew on
MLSsoccer’s mock 1st round saw 2 people say that Joao Plata, one of the young foreign players in the draft pool, will go in the top 5. Plata has played real games for LDU Quito at just 18, plays for Ecuador’s u20 team. A talent like that could be right up there with Nagbe.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 8, 2026 12:34 PM EST reply actions
Yeah, Plata seems to be high on everybody’s draft list. He could be tempting for Ben Olson at the #3 pick, especially if it is deemed that Plata has more upside (long term) than Bruin. Of course, the same mock draft had two of the MLSsoccer.com guys sending Perry Kitchen to DCU with the #3 pick. If Kitchen is still on the board, it’ll be hard for Olson to turn him down, unless he’s determined to get us an offensive player.
Back to Plata, we can see him in action today at the combine. His AdiZero team plays @ 3:30 ET this afternoon, streamed live on mlssoccer.com. Will Bruin is also on that same AdiZero team - perhaps the combine team to watch for DCU fans, since neither Nagbe or Kitchen are participating in the combine.
by madavis on Jan 8, 2026 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
Plata
I need to do more research on this kid, but I think I would hate this. United has been absolutely terrible at evaluating foreign talent lately. But they’re pretty damn good at bringing young Americans up to speed quickly. Without knowing much about him, I would rate Plata below Bruin and Salgado.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekend Writer for SBNation DC.
by Martin Shatzer on Jan 8, 2026 2:11 PM EST up reply actions
Yes, foreign/unproven talent makes me a bit nervous too, which is why I tend to think Bruin and Kitchen are better fits for DCU and Ben Olson. I would be a bit more comfortable as a fan with either of those two as our #3 pick.
by madavis on Jan 8, 2026 3:53 PM EST up reply actions
Speaking of Plata, I just got to watch him from the MLS combine. He scored a good looking goal for his team, and it’s obvious he has a lot of talent on the ball. After he scored his goal, though, he disappeared from the game. Also of note, is how short he is, and I mean short. He’s got a good solid frame, but he can’t be any taller than 5’ 2". His skill is evident, however, and his playing style reminds me of Messi’s (forgive the comparison). I only mean that he’s good with the ball at his feet, and has a knack for getting through defenders and creating his shots. Of course, this is only a first impression from a sample of one game.
Will Bruin had a disappointing game, I thought. Although, in his defense, the service he got from midfield was shaky
by madavis on Jan 8, 2026 6:05 PM EST up reply actions
One crucial difference
United has been poor with foreign players of late, but those guys were supposed to be the finished product. Plata is 18, and turning youngsters into good players is one of the only things we seem to do OK at.
by ChestRockwell on Jan 10, 2026 2:17 PM EST up reply actions
Kovalenko
Does Dema play a role in draft trade decisions? Simms and the 3rd pick could be traded to Vancouver for the first pick and United could sign Kovalenko to fill the void left by Simms.
by Zach J on Jan 9, 2026 2:51 PM EST reply actions








