Hoyos: the new Rossi?
After declining US U-20 invites to stay with his club, Estudiantes, Hoyos has decided to accept an Argentine U-20 invite. Looks like US fans are losing out on another young prodigy with dual citizenship. I don't think I'm too off base by saying that American fans harbor a lot of bitterness towards Giuseppe Rossi when he did what Hoyos is doing. But I wonder: is that really an appropriate response?
Here's what I wrote in the comments section of the YA article:
Anyone else see this coming a mile away?
I could be persuaded that Bradley doesn't appreciate his Latino players as much as he could--Torres has certainly deserved more minutes than he's got. On the other hand, I don't want the USSF to lgo out of their way to court dual citizens who aren't fully ready to commit to the cause. That's a dressing room disaster waiting to happen--dual citizen feels they aren't getting enough love, other players feel they're getting too much, play on the field stagnates because of growing angst and distraction, etc.
What's interesting is that we the American fans feel highly betrayed that someone who we thought was one of ours could walk away, whereas I'm not sure Rossi, Subotic, or perhaps Hoyos really feel like betrayers, being free to choose between their two countries of origin. In fact, if I were any of those guys, I would feel betrayed by US fans, who seemed to have taken my free choice for granted and then abusing me when I made it. (Rossi, especially: he was just following in his family's footsteps. Up until he left for Europe, he was playing soccer in America--who said he was playing American soccer?)
Just my thoughts, anyways."
Tweet
2 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Depends on each case
Rossi was born here; his game would not be what it is if he hadn’t been here. It also seems to me that Rossi would have chosen the US if he was deciding between the US and, say, Guatemala, or Albania, or some other country we’re clearly better than. When you’re picking your national team based on which one is better, you’re not really following your heart (as we were told he was doing). I’ve just never bought the idea that it was purely an emotional decision. It’s more lucrative to play for Italy, and more likely to garner you more fame.
Subotic was only US-eligible by a series of flukes. Frankly, if he had chosen to play for the US, it would have been perhaps a more egregious version of what Rossi did. At least Rossi had a real connection to Italy; Subotic’s family could have easily fled to England or France instead of the US. I was disappointed he didn’t want to suit up for us, but in his shoes I can see why he felt the connection to Serbia much more than he’d feel one to the US. The cloud hangs over his decision because, unlike Rossi, he did play in the US youth set-up. I guess that should also be galling in it’s own way, but I’ve never found myself feeling let down by Subotic’s decision from a moral standpoint, while Rossi’s decision has always bothered me.
With Hoyos, I can see why he chose to accept the Argentine invite but not the US invite. He’s trying to crack the Estudiantes first team; generally speaking, you don’t lose your spot at a club when accepting a call up to your youth national team. However, there’s a big difference between heading to the US for a camp and driving like 30 miles to one (La Plata is about as far from Buenos Aires as DC is from Baltimore). There is also the very real possibility that coaches at Estudiantes expressed concerns about US methods; we’re still not exactly respected in the coaching department by other powerful countries.
by ChestRockwell on Feb 24, 2025 3:24 PM EST reply actions
Word. Solid points on all counts. Hadn’t thought about Hoyos’ situation like that. Yanks Abroad stopped covering him because they seem to think that the lad has picked the bad guys over the good guys, but based the two posts above, yours and mine, I’m sure it’s more complicated than that.
by Dan Murphy on Feb 28, 2025 11:28 PM EST reply actions

by Dan Murphy on 






