Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Miami Meltdown: Tempers Flare As Pacers Hammer Heat

Referee Jasen Anno Screws D.C. United, Ethan White Responds

Ben Olsen said that the story of D.C. United vs. Toronto FC game shouldn't be about the referee, but by going the unprecedented route of issuing an official statement after the match, I feel that the referee just became the story.

Maybe a more experienced media member or a fellow SB Nation blog manager can correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think its commonplace in any way for referees to issue written statements after a match. And yet I received an email from the D.C. United Communications group just over an hour after the final whistle.

But before I publish it, I want to make very clear that I'm only taking issue with Toronto's second goal, not the red card to Bill Hamid. I happened to agree with the red card because Hamid's challenge was unnecessarily violent and he had no chance of getting the ball. I was in a room with several veteran soccer reporters, many of whom happen to also be accredited U.S. Soccer referees, and the room was split 50-50 on the card. It was questionable. Could have gone either way. It happened to go against us this time.

Now then. Here's the official statement from referee Jasen Anno:

Clarification of sequence of events for the substitution of D.C. United player, McDonald (out), White (in) in the 69th minute:

In the 66th minute D.C. United player, McDonald left the field of play due to injury and did not return. Play was restarted with a drop ball. After roughly two minutes of play, the fourth official notified the referee for the next available substitution for D.C. United. The next stoppage was a throw-in for Toronto in the 69th minute. Play was stopped and the referee beckoned the substitute, D.C. United player, White on to the field. At that moment, the Senior Assistant Referee and the fourth official told the player to enter the field of play, which he did. Play was restarted with the whistle and the ball was put into play by Toronto.

With a statement that reeks so heavily of excuses and a complete failure to acknowledge any sort of error whatsoever, I feel I must respond. My response contains both video, and a first-hand account of the situation from Ethan White himself.

Star-divide

In this video, you see referee Jasen Anno appears to be indicating to the Toronto player to wait on taking the throw-in while he waves for the substitution to occur, but TFC takes the throw anyway, and all hell breaks lose. United is disorganized and fails to mark Julian de Guzman, who has all the time in the world to deliver a knuckleball (in the words of Steve Cronin) into United's net. (CSN-Washington has video here.)

And now here's the complete word-for-word transcription of our conversation with Ethan White in the locker room after the match. He told the story eloquently and with complete confidence, and I tend to believe him more than the referee's statement.

The play has to stop when there's a sub. I mean, Brandon's off the field, but I'm not returning on the field. You don't wave me on. You've gotta stop play. I'm not even sure what to say right now. Unbelievable.

The fourth official was screaming at him to stop play. And then I just sprinted on the field because play hadn't stopped, so I took it upon myself to run on the field. But by the time I took three steps, the ball's in the back of the net.

He said he waved me on, but I'm not returning back on the field. You wave on an injured player that's returning back on the field. I was never on the field. So [the referee is supposed to] stop play and wait for me to get in my position. Whether I'm a forward or a goalie or a center back, you're supposed to wait and let me get back in goal. If I'm a goalie you're not gonna wave on and play and let them kick it in the back of the goal.

I can think of two explanations for why this happened as it did. I don't think Anno was specifically out to screw D.C. United by any stretch, but as you might guess, I take issue with both of the possible explanations. They are:

  1. The referee thought that Ethan White was Brandon McDonald. He thought that the injured player was returning back onto the field, which would mean that it would be acceptable for Anno to wave him on while play continues. Aside from the racially insensitive nature of this explanation, I don't think its true for a couple reasons. First, McDonald left the far corner of the field, and was walking back behind the goal. Since he's a center back, if he was going to return onto the field, it makes no sense that he would return from the bench. Secondly, the fourth official was holding up the substitution board with the numbers "2" and "15" on it. That's a substitution, dude, not a player returning from injury.
  2. The referee thought Ethan White was a forward. Easy mistake since White played forward for a few minutes last week. That must be what the referee was thinking, right? Nope. But even if he did think White was a forward, the rules don't change, as White pointed out. He can't just wave him on since he's a forward who wouldn't likely be involved in the ensuing play at the other end of the field. He has to let the substitute get into position before play resumes.

Those are the only two realistic explanations I can come up with. Note that neither of those explanations are what was contained in the referee's official statement - a statement that clearly disagrees with White's summary of what took place.

I'm not normally much of an apologist. And I still think the three goals that United gave up had more to do with goalkeeping mistakes from both our keepers than any single referee's decision. But I have a sinking feeling that this might be the match we look back on in November when United misses the playoffs by one point.

Comment 26 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

We're going to make the playoffs

And if we don’t, it will be because of forward-going screwups, not because we tied a game a man down for 94 minutes (stoppage time included) after a debatable red care and this completely incompetent and ex ante dishonest episode, which you have exposed well.

I think mental confusion on the ref’s part is the explanation, along with the lack of nerve to nullify the goal.

As for the team, salvaging a point from this debacle might have been their finest hour (and a half, plus stoppage time).

by dccal on Aug 7, 2011 2:11 AM EDT reply actions  

You've identified the third possible explanation

3. The referee made a mistake allowing play to continue because he forgot the rule momentarily, but was too timid to stop play once Toronto had already thrown the ball in.

Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..

by Martin Shatzer on Aug 7, 2011 7:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

To be fair

Given Toronto’s past history, the chances of them scoring were pretty slim. Perhaps the ref thought he could just let this one slide.

by Brendanukkah on Aug 7, 2011 8:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, just our luck...

…this time de Guzman doesn’t sky the ball over the bar.

by DrWeevil on Aug 7, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

No kidding

That’s the first goal he’s ever scored. That’s epically bad luck.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Aug 7, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Explanation Isn't Unprecedented

It’s an excerpt from his match report, which every USSF referee writes after every match.

While it’s clear that the ref’s actions on the substitution violated custom and normal expectations (and evidenced his consistent determination not to be fair in officiating this match), it’s less clear to me, after some study, that he violated the laws of the game in a technical sense. Which gives us no comfort, and Olsen clearly did the right thing by getting himself tossed in response.

You can debate the red card all you’d like, but there was a sufficient basis for it. Hamid’s charge was reckless. That’s not really debatable. It was a brutally close call, and the most important mitigating factor (that Hamid deliberately tucked his legs under him before he crashed into Avila) really wasn’t all that evident at full speed without benefit of a replay.

by landruajm on Aug 7, 2011 9:28 AM EDT reply actions  

Thanks for the info

So maybe its just unprecedented that DCU would email that specific excerpt to reporters, knowing that we’d all be interested in reading it.

Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..

by Martin Shatzer on Aug 7, 2011 10:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sure

It’s a way to highlight referee ineptitude without actually doing something that draws sanctions from the league. Or more specifically, to get friendly reporters to highlight referee ineptitude, which is surely fair game.

And it’s also clear from the CSN video you shared that Anno did not tell the complete truth on his match report. White wasn’t on the field when Toronto took the throw-in.

by landruajm on Aug 7, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

What FIFA's "Laws of the Game" publication says:

Under “Interpretations of the Laws of the Game and Guidelines for Referees”, the Laws of the Game states (for Law 5) , under “Use of Whistle” (pg 76): “The whistle is needed to: … restart play after it has been stopped due to: … —substitution” (emphasis in original). It also states that the whistle is not needed to restart play from a throw-in, and I think he didn’t have his head in the game and was focusing more on the throw in and got wrapped around the axle. Because despite his report it’s clear he never blew the whistle, motioning for the restart and the substitution nearly simultaneously. This incident shows me he wasn’t fit to referee this game. As mentioned, not only does FIFA call for a stoppage and a whistle to restart, but custom and sportsmanship (as Ethan White points out) also call for a stoppage to allow the substituting team to reform. This man definitely had an attitude problem.

by DrWeevil on Aug 7, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

I was only looking at USSF materials. Certainly MLS referees should at least pretend to follow FIFA guidance, especially where it doesn’t conflict.

I very much agree about Anno’s fitness in a competence sense.

by landruajm on Aug 7, 2011 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

The entire play on the throw-in was a mess. The ref was clearly in the wrong because he could have easily just stopped the play. He let chaos take over.

Hamid’s red was 100% right though. He was the last man, he didn’t come close to the ball, and he flew into Avila’s legs. Avila’s lucky all that happened was that he was cartwheeled.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Aug 7, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I don't think too many people on this site are questioning Hamid's red

At first I was upset about McDonald not taking more charge on that play, but the more I watch it, the more I wonder what Hamid was even doing out that far? The ball was not at all close to the goal, or even in the box, and McDonald was close enough to make a play on it. Perhaps he was just overadrenalized from his USMNT callup and wanted to get on absolutely everything. Still, there was no reason he should have been involved in the play anyway. I understand the red card, and it was a boneheaded move.

by Brendanukkah on Aug 7, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Overadrenalized -> Overconfident

Which I believe is something that Mr. Bartlett aka spidergoose has been warning us about all along.

Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..

by Martin Shatzer on Aug 7, 2011 7:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

But the bill was out of Toronto’s control by the time Hamid got there. He didn’t cause the loss of the ball.

by SBnationreader11 on Aug 11, 2011 6:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

It was a horrible moment for the ref

I really think he knows he screwed up, but I doubt he will admit it. That said, I wish our defense was a little more focused once they realized the ref was letting play go. It was just a sucky sequence. I guess every MLS team has to get royally screwed by a ref at least once this year. It was our turn.

by madavis on Aug 7, 2011 12:01 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

it's not the first time

anybody remember New England?

Most diverse sports fan you will ever meet. Literally.

by ClingingMars on Aug 7, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Did Benny get red carded?

I never saw one come out for him, but I know he was tossed out. If he was red carded, that means he won’t be on the bench for next week’s match, right?

by madavis on Aug 7, 2011 12:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Correct

And he was red carded, according to the match report.

by Brendanukkah on Aug 7, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Olsen got sent off

Typically refs don’t show red cards to coaches when they send them off.

by DrWeevil on Aug 7, 2011 12:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Statement stinks on ice.

He claims he blew the whistle. It is clear from the video he did no such thing. FIFA’s guidelines on Law 5 require him to blow the whistle to restart play after a substitution.

It doesn’t bother me so much that he made a mistake. It’s the unwillingness to own up to it, both in real time (by allowing a play that technically never took place to stand) , but then later weaseling out on his report. This never works; cameras are pointed at you the whole time.

I think the explanation is 3) he thought he was following guidelines by allowing a quick restart. But you can’t in that situation. In other words, this guy is not ready for prime time.

I would also like to see the statement re Hamid red card. I don’t think it was a red card due to the violence of the challenge. I think here too he thought he was following guidelines: he was thinking denial of goal scoring opportunity which, because McDonald cleared the ball before the foul occurred, was also wrong.

by DrWeevil on Aug 7, 2011 12:16 PM EDT reply actions  

This quote was taken from the SBI recap --

“Any moment you can get like that, you take advantage of it,” de Guzman said. “Many of the best teams in the world — how should I put it? — cheat when they have the chance to do something. It was a good opportunity for myself to find open space.”

And that’s how I feel about this game: cheated. It seems that DCU has been cheated several times this season from poor player decisions (see Bill Hamid’s tackle) to poor officiating (see most of the games this season.)

by DCUFaninMissouri on Aug 7, 2011 2:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Charlie Davies was unavailable for comment

I don’t blame Toronto for taking the throw-in. It’s simply the ref’s job to stop play if they have taken the throw-in before he has blown his whistle to restart after a substitution.

BTW, did you notice that both the Toronto and DC announcers thought they were seeing a goal scored off a free kick? That’s because the Toronto player who received the thrown-in (Morgan I think) stood over the ball for a moment expecting Anno to stop play. When that didn’t happen, by now with the ball at a complete rest, he must have figured “what the hell” and played it to de Guzman.

by dccal on Aug 7, 2011 4:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think it MIGHT have been the second explanation

Late into the match against SJ last week, Ethan White was subbed in and played forward. Why? I dunno but he was pretty close to the SJ backline.

by Zach J on Aug 7, 2011 6:36 PM EDT reply actions  

Some of us Sounders fans b*itch about calls occasionally

and there have been some howlers in MLS this season (like most seasons), but I have to think we probably won’t see a worse job by a ref than this all season.

Look on the bright side – at least Andy Iro is a fair-minded kind of guy and spotted you a couple of goals to make up for it.

by Nevtelen on Aug 7, 2011 10:00 PM EDT reply actions  

“Play was restarted with the whistle and the ball was put into play by Toronto.” Totally NOT what happened. Toronto threw the ball in before White got on the field. BAD REFEREE!! Red card for lying at the very least!

by SBnationreader11 on Aug 11, 2011 6:08 PM EDT reply actions  

US Soccer

Check out this week’s US Soccer Week in Review video. They review this play.

by ashawley on Aug 20, 2011 8:18 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation fan blog in support of D.C. United!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
DC United Stadium Plans?
Ldg_tuck_small
Playing the "What If?" Game - Bill Hamid
Ldg_tuck_small
Positives from Loss to San Jose
Small
Our Back Line Was Holier Than Sunday Against San Jose.
Small
The Road To Dominance
Mvc-830f_small
What's with the TV matches -- or lack thereof?
Small
Visiting fan seeks guidance
Dsc_0182_small
Want to talk about DCU? Seeking an interview participant!
Small
LA Galaxy lack of travel
Dtom_small
Fantasy MLS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Martin2_small Martin Shatzer

Authors

Hbsc_small ChestRockwell

Fedora_small The AMT

N7601079_33456630_4404_small benuski