clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

D.C. United vs. Columbus Crew: Where it all went wrong

The easy answer is "everywhere," but where did things really break down for D.C. United in their season-opening loss to the Crew?

Paul Frederiksen-USA TODAY Sport

Well that sucked. Having slept on the result of last night's dismantling at the hands of the Columbus Crew, the sting is hardly any less. What was supposed to be the unveiling of a newly competitive squad that would not make the same mistakes the 2013 version of D.C. United made on a weekly basis instead revealed a 2014 edition that made entirely new mistakes in to what has to be called an embarrassing debut. This is going to be my weekly take on the big tactical factors that turned the game, and unfortunately, there's not really any good to talk about.

Higuain > Silva + Kitchen

If you're a fan of Matthew Doyle,'s Armchair Analyst, as I am, you're familiar with his take on the modern #10. In years past, the great playmakers found space in the center of the park, between the opposing midfield and defensive lines. With the advent of defensive midfielders, that space no longer really exists against most teams, so successful attacking midfielders have gone elsewhere to find space. Last night, Federico Higuain put on a clinic proving this to be true. While nominally a central midfielder, Higuain has license to roam sideline-to-sideline to find space and overload one side of the field or the other.

And did he ever put that license to good use. When D.C. were in possession, Higuain defended from a central position alongside or behind Crew center forward Jairo Arrieta, but when Columbus turned United over, he vacated that space almost immediately, moving wide. Meanwhile, Perry Kitchen had instructions to maintain his central position in front of Bobby Boswell and Jeff Parke. That left Higuain free to find space to receive a pass and all but guaranteed that the combination of Higuain and the Crew midfielder and fullback on that side of the field would have numbers with the ball on that flank, against only a wide midfielder and fullback from the home side. To counter this, Luis Silva was forced to chase Higuain wide, which pulled him out of position when United tried to counter.

The end result of this situation was a big advantage for the visitors, as Higuain was much, much more involved than Silva, completing 73 (84%) of his 87 pass attempts, while Silva only attempted 38 passes over the course of the game. Higuain's outplaying Silva and neutralizing Kitchen by moving away from the central zone fully explains Columbus' dominance in possession (57%-43%) and was the biggest deciding factor in the game. What makes it more unfortunate is that it's obvious that the Crew are always going to funnel everything through Higuain, and taking him out of the game is the Alpha and Omega of defending Columbus - and we completely failed to come close to doing it.

Going forward, the question, tactically, is whether this is something Ben Olsen and his staff can correct without ditching the modified 4-4-2 diamond they re-adopted this preseason. Perry Kitchen is among the better defensive midfielders in the league, but that's not much use if his impact can be reduced to nothing simply by overloading either side of the field. Luis Silva dropped deeper and deeper yesterday to find the ball, but to little avail. Would he have more success against a team that packs the midfield a la the Crew by mimicking his counterpart on Saturday and moving to wide, rather than deep, spots? Or will we see a quick reversion to the double-pivot of the last season-and-a-half?

Other Features

Of course, it wasn't just Higuain vs. 11. The midfield battle, which the Black-and-Red thoroughly lost, was the biggest feature of this game, but there were others, too.

  • Let's start with a quick positive: Bill Hamid's distribution was much improved over past years, as he only had four passes find somebody other than a teammate. A lot of that is on the improved aerial and hold-up play offered by Eddie Johnson and Fabian Espindola.
  • That's about the most you can say for Johnson's contribution to the game, however. The striker received virtually no service and struggled to make his mark on the game. As you can see in the chalkboard below, most of Johnson's 33 pass attempts were backwards, as he was unable to find space to receive the ball facing upfield. What's worse, he had all of three touches in the penalty area and only two shots (one headed), both off-target.


  • Adding in Espindola to Johnson's chalkboard, and you can see that United's forwards were forced to play exactly where the Crew wanted them to: on United's right side, far from goal. Add in the general absence of any impact from wide midfielders Nick DeLeon and Davy Arnaud along with Silva's absence (discussed above) and it's no surprise that United failed to utter much danger.


  • Finally, United were static with the ball. Off-ball runs don't show up on chalkboards, but too often last night - and last year - 9 players wearing black-and-red stood around waiting for the one guy with the ball to do something. Nobody made runs while United were in possession that could pull defenders out of position or open up pockets of space. Nobody looked to combine or take on the burden of making something happen. Nobody, it seemed, was willing to work for his teammates. Until that changes, nothing else will.

With United off next weekend, it'll be a couple of weeks until I write another of these columns. Hopefully the next one will have more positives to talk about.