D.C. United Signs Veteran Midfielder Marcelo Saragosa
In an unsurprising development, Brazilian midfielder Marcelo Saragosa has been signed by D.C. United after a brief trial. At 30 years old, Saragosa has 7 years of MLS experience (with the LA Galaxy, Chivas USA, and FC Dallas) but joins United after a couple of seasons playing in Azerbaijan.
While hardly a big name, Saragosa can at least brag about having friends in the right places; the best man at his wedding was some dude named Kaká. It's also worth noting that Saragosa acquired a green card during his previous stint in MLS, so he will not take up an international roster spot.
Saragosa's primary position is defensive midfield, a position DC happened to be thin at. Regular readers of this blog know how most of us feel about Kurt Morsink and his habit of making huge, game-changing mistakes. With Perry Kitchen a probable member of the US Olympic squad, there is a real chance that United will need 7-10 starts out of whoever ends up as his back-up.
Supplemental draft pick Lance Rozeboom is getting rave reviews from his fellow players, but the percentage of supplemental picks who emerged from college ready for that many starts (especially playing arguably the most complex and critical role in the modern game) is virtually nil. Other options include Stephen King - who has little experience at the position - and Brandon McDonald, who is more comfortable at center back.
Saragosa is not strictly a holding midfielder, however. With the Galaxy, Saragosa played both defensive midfield and also a box-to-box role, though it should be noted that he will never be mistaken for a potential source of goals (he has just 2 goals in 116 MLS appearances). At Chivas USA and FC Dallas, he made rather more than a handful of appearances at right back and even played a few games at right midfield. While he probably won't see too much time in those roles here, it's awfully nice to have that on your bench (particularly if we're trying to protect a lead).
While not a major signing, Saragosa brings numerous positives to the table. He was a member of the 2005 MLS Cup-winning Galaxy side, which fits in with Ben Olsen's desire to fill his roster with players that can be safely described as "winners." That type of player is the guy that will find reserves of energy to make that last sprint to prevent a cross in stoppage time; it's also the guy that will train hard every day even if he doesn't get a minute of first-team action for a long spell. Saragosa's history is one of being a very team-first player, so we can be reasonably certain that he won't get frustrated or stop working hard when Kitchen isn't with the Olympic team.
In terms of what he offers on the field, Saragosa is the kind of player you don't notice too much. His first touch is reliable enough that he avoids costly giveaways, and his passing skills are sharp enough that he doesn't often misplace the ball. Those things are augmented by his understanding that he's not out there to be a star player. Saragosa will rarely attempt anything risky with the ball; he knows very well to leave that sort of thing to guys like Dwayne De Rosario, Andy Najar, and Branko Boskovic.
Defensively, Saragosa is a better-than-average tackler and is strong enough to win shoulder-to-shoulder battles regularly. He also brings a rather rugged - but not dirty - approach to the job. When Saragosa replaces Kitchen, we aren't going to lose too much in the "hard-nosed" category, in other words. In terms of positioning, Saragosa is steady but not exactly the new Claude Makelele.
All in all, Saragosa is reasonable depth for an MLS team. I argued long and loud that United would regret moving on without Clyde Simms, but most of the argument hinged on the fact that we lacked precisely this kind of reliable player as depth at a position that can't be ignored. Signing Saragosa eliminates that concern.
We've talked fairly often about the King Standard here at B&RU, and I think Saragosa can serve a similar purpose for us at the defensive midfield position. If so Rozeboom can blossom into a quality MLS player and surpasses Saragosa, then we've improved as a team. If not, the bar is still higher than it was last year, and that's how you build a championship team.
39 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Has Morsink's signing ever actually been announced?
But it’s also important to note that he’s undergoing a surgery that will probably keep him out for six weeks or so. So whether Morsink is a good enough player or not is actually a moot point. But this is a nice depth move, and a player that could honestly challenge Kitchen, at this stage of his career, for the starting defensive midfielder position.
Didn't ever see it announced, but...
Everyone is acting like he’s signed, so I assume he must be.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 2:10 PM EST up reply actions
Why?
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
by Martin Shatzer on Feb 6, 2012 6:13 PM EST up reply actions
hmmm
So, we now have Kitchen, Saragosa, Morsink, King, and possibly Rozeboom. So far, Bosko has not featured prominently centrally for DC in our preseason games.
Is it possible Benny’s thinking bucket 4-4-2? Two holding midfielders, and the obvious attackers Bosko, Hamdi, De Ro, and Najar? This is the only reason I can think of for having this many d-mids.
Neither Diamond nor Bucket
I would have said it’s more like Olsen’s looking at an 8 and a 6, in a midfield that is neither flat/bucket-ish nor truly a diamond, with Boskovic and Kitchen the first choices in those positions respectively, and King and Saragosa second choice respectively. If I recall correctly, King has rarely played as a 6. (If my guess is right, that leaves DeRo playing between the lines, ahead of where the tip of the diamond would be, but often more withdrawn than a second striker would be. Though probably DeRo will often float freely to whereever he can do the most damage.)
I really doubt that Morsink figures too prominently in calculations about starting roles — if he makes the squad, it’s as a guy who keeps the intensity up in practice. (Though, speaking of Morsink, I’ve always liked him in a weird way — gives 110% and has vision, just not the skill or athleticism to play in MLS. I think he’d be a fantastic player down a level.)
I’d love to be wrong, but I’d guess the same about Rozeboom — smells like a player who does a year or two, and then moves on without ever having been a major contributor, even if he does pick up some sub appearances.
All that said, wouldn’t be shocked by a starting midfield of Boskovic-Kitchen-Saragosa-Najar until Pontius is up to starting — but I think that’d be compromising what Ben wants to do, not his ideal formation.
De Ro's position will be listed as forward, but will really just be whatever he wants it to be
You’ve pretty much got it in my book, though I don’t think we’ll ever see King playing high up enough to call the formation a diamond. When he starts ahead of a defensive midfielder, it’ll be more of a T-shaped midfield (or a Y-shape, if we’re trying to be aggressive).
If maintaining a diamond is considered key for a specific game and Boskovic is unavailable, De Ro will move back to that spot and Josh Wolff will start up front.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 2:52 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think we’ll ever see King playing high up enough...
Absolutely. And while Boskovic may push higher than King on average (and play more like a 10/more at the tip of a diamond than King), I suspect we’ll see him play a role that’s as much 8 as it is 10.
Consequence of the modern game
#10s at this point are either pushed up as withdrawn forwards or require a 5 man midfield.
Boskovic will be deep enough where calling him a #8 would be accurate, even though his responsibility as a passer will be more like what a #10 traditionally does. He will have to function as both, while De Ro will also have more than a little #10 in his job description as well.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 3:05 PM EST up reply actions
Revision
Based on Chest’s post below, I’m going to say I would be surprised by Boskovic-Saragosa-Kitchen-Najar — I’d expect Cruz-Boskovic-Kitchen-Najar.
It would be a surprise for us to start with 2 defensive midfielders
In fact, if that midfield four were used, I’d expect Saragosa to be ahead of Kitchen in more of a T-shape. I don’t think Olsen likes playing the Bob Bradley-style box midfield as a starting lineup, though we’ll probably see it a few times if we’re trying to kill a game off.
In terms of getting the best 11 players on the field, I think Cruz would be chosen ahead of Saragosa. Cruz also recently told someone (Goff? the United website? Can’t remember) that he doesn’t particularly care about which wing he plays on. He never played on the left in Houston because Brad Davis was out there, but here we’ll probably see him used on both flanks.
My current expectation is that Cruz will be starting at left midfield on March 10th. Even if DeLeon pushes up to be even with Cruz on the depth chart, starting a rookie against the unrelenting high pressure Sporting KC uses would be a mistake. Plus, I think Cruz will be more effective at getting under the skin of the KC players, who are among MLS’s least disciplined groups.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 3:00 PM EST up reply actions
Cruz on the left
Mirrors the way Pontius plays the position a bit, too? Cutting in, shooting with the right foot?
I don’t know this, it’s just a bit of speculation based on Cruz having typically played on the right.
Probably won't do it as often, but mostly because Pontius is more skillful
Cruz doesn’t have the moves to cut in and get that shot as often as Pontius does, so I think we’re more likely going to see him try to get around opposing right backs with speed and/or hustle and then cut inside the box from there. He’s going to put defenders in tricky spots as far as tackling, and should be able to hit low crosses or cut the ball back from there.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
"We became a counterattack team last year largely because we didn’t have Boskovic. He is a playmaker, he gives us possession, and he’s going to make players around him much better."
- Benny Olsen
I think Boskovic is likely to play the playmaker role, but I could imagine a lot of flexibility on the field during the run of play. Benny likes to switch Pontius and Najar with some regularity… I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Boskovic – Pontius/Najar – DeRo triangle rotate occasionally mid-game this season.
by rke on Feb 6, 2012 2:46 PM EST up reply actions
I'm pretty sure Boskovic played in the middle against Malmo
I know the club put out a formation that seemed to list him at left midfield, but that would have meant Cruz playing in the middle (something he has never done before and a job he’s ill-suited for).
My read of that lineup is a 4312: Hamid; Russell, Jakovic, McDonald, Woolard; Najar, Kitchen, Cruz; Boskovic; De Rosario, Brettschneider (note: you could also call it a 4132, depending on whether Najar and Cruz pushed up high or played their roles more conservatively).
It would be a massive departure for Boskovic to be pushed out left on a team that wants to be possession-focused while playing Cruz totally out of position in the middle. I’m not saying it didn’t happen, but it would be virtually inexplicable if it did.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions
Stouffer says Bosko will play centrally
I tweeted him earlier today — he’s got a great piece in the Examiner on Bosko (didn’t know Stouffer could write that well) . I asked, and Stouffer seemed pretty confident in saying “Central”.
Worth noting is a Q&A with Olsen at today’s presser.
"My favorite fan base in D.C. Is United's. Period. The end." - Steinberg
Which DC sports team has the Most Valuable Players? That would be DC United, a team being pushed out by the city. Help Keep United in DC so they can receive a fair deal on a lease and help develop a path to build a stadium with local investment and incentives.
Stouffer has elevated his play. Pushing for a DP contract
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
by Martin Shatzer on Feb 6, 2012 6:19 PM EST up reply actions
Just asking the question
At most positions, we have depth (except for leftback) but this position is incredibly deep considering we all assumed Kitchen would be the lone stopper.
DCU site lists him as Int'l. Are you sure about the green card?
I realize the roster page on DCU’s website has been fraught with errors for some time. The site still lists m as “Salary Budget Player – Int’l”. You’d think they’d get the information right when they’re first adding the player to the page. I can think of other players who were incorrectly listed as “int’l”, but I still have to ask — Are you sure he has a green card?
Google says so. That’s also how I remember it, though I’ve been off about those things a couple times (e.g. found out just yesterday that Kei Kamara has a green card).
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 2:53 PM EST up reply actions
Whoops -- Damn computer....
I hate when it deletes a whole bunch of text without my realizing it, just because I move the cursor.
That was supposed to say:
I realize the roster page on DCU’s website has been fraught with errors for some time. The site still lists Kitchen as a GA player. As for Saragosa, the team website lists him as "Salary Budget Player – Int’l". You’d think they’d get the information right when they’re first adding the player to the page. I can think of other players who were incorrectly listed as "int’l", but I still have to ask — Are you sure he has a green card?
Further linkage
This piece from 2009 says that Saragosa was not at the start of camp for FC Dallas so that he could receive his green card in the near future.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Whoops
Posted this in the main thread, but meant to reply here…
“Since he was out of the country for more than a year, could his green card have lapsed?
"
Not really a permanent resident if he was in Azerbajan…
Not sure how that stuff works
I know other players with green cards have left MLS, returned, and still had domestic status. Gonzalo Segares is the most recent example I can think of, though he was playing in Cyprus for less than a year.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 6, 2012 4:07 PM EST up reply actions
He has a green card
Just confirmed it with the team
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
by Martin Shatzer on Feb 6, 2012 7:02 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Maybe we're just feeling hopeful?
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 7, 2012 1:58 PM EST up reply actions
The King Standard
This move definitely gives us more flexibility for those times when Kitchen isn’t available. I was worried that we’d have to alter our formation to give King some more defensive help in defensive midfield, but if Saragosa is able to fill in as a straight replacement for Kitchen, we should do well.
And the bar has definitely been raised. Blakebrett had apparently dropped below the King Standard, so he was waived. And now Saragosa is above it.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
He's a Brazilian d-mid
I doubt he’s interested in wearing a #10 shirt. Out of curiosity, who would you like to claim it?
Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United
The Famous Rooney
But with DCU’s budget, realisticly it would be someone from the current squad. So either DeRo, Pontuis, Najar.
Someone attack-minded and reliable should a #10.
I’m weird about jersey numbers to be honest. Like it bothers me when someone other than a goalie takes the #12. Or a midfielder taking the #2.
I don’t think anybody on the current roster is going to be switching to #10, or they already would have done it. Rozeboom might claim it if/when he signs, or somebody else entirely might.
As for #s, I always thought #12 traditionally went to the usual first sub, which would rarely be a ’keeper.
Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United
2 different eras
12 was the number of the most likely replacement back in the days of the 235 and before the idea of substitutions had been placed in someone’s dream-fortress.
After subs, 12 became the back-up GK’s number until the mid-to-late 90s, when things started to loosen up.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 7, 2012 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
"most likely replacement"
That’s a little awkward. The guy that would have been preferred to replace someone for the next game.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Feb 7, 2012 2:01 PM EST up reply actions
















