Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Kobe Bryant Will Never Top Michael Jordan

Is D.C. United Done With Its 2012 Roster?

Daniel Woolard is the sole occupant of the biggest hole in United's lineup

D.C. United has already made more moves than I would have expected this offseason. The team has filled more of its needs than we thought they would. United has signed a shiny new designated player to score goals and fill the void left by Charlie Davies, acquired depth throughout the midfield to replace Santino Quaranta and Clyde Simms, and added two new potential starters to the back line.

Hamdi Salihi may be even better than Davies. Nick DeLeon, Danny Cruz, Marcelo Saragosa, and a healthy Branko Boskovic are almost definitely better than Quaranta and Simms. And Robbie Russell and Emiliano Dudar will add size, experience, and toughness to our defense. But the 2012 offseason doesn't quite yet seem complete.

That's because there's one hugely conspicuous hole that still exists on our roster. It happens to be at the position that has been the team's biggest hole for the last decade. That hole got even bigger this year.

In a conversation with Steve Goff last week, Ben Olsen noted that Daniel Woolard was "Maybe our best defender last year." We disagree. And to suggest that he may have been United's best defender is somewhat revisionist, considering that Olsen himself replaced Woolard in the starting lineup with Marc Burch when the left back struggled. Which was fairly often.

With all the other upgrades that happened this offseason, fans would have likely been satisfied to maintain some semblance of the status quo. Woolard with Burch behind him wasn't quite acceptable, but it would do. Woolard with a healthy Jed Zayner behind him would've been alright too.

But Woolard and Woolard alone? The guy who is already the lowest quality of United's 11 starters has no viable depth behind him?

Star-divide

The results of United's recent preseason matches isn't concerning. What's concerning is that a guest player was backing up Woolard at left back on Saturday against Sporting Kansas City. Not a trialist, a guest player. Not an undrafted rookie, or a USL standout, or a young stud from elsewhere in CONCACAF, or an Academy player who might be ready for the next step. We're talking about a 30-year old retiree.

Olsen has spoke (in the same Goff story) about Chris Korb pushing both Russell and Woolard for playing time, but we've yet to see him on the left, either in preseason games so far in 2012 or in the 2011 regular season. If Korb is a viable option at left back, why have we never seen him play there?

Throughout the rest of the roster, United has made some great moves. They may have improved more than any other MLS team so far this offseason (besides probably the LA Galaxy, which is damn scary). But that one remaining gaping hole might be a pretty big problem more often than we'd like to think.

Is Ben Olsen done assembling the 2012 D.C. United roster? Should he be?

Comment 34 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

For what it's worth

Korb played the entirety of his time at Akron on the left, because Kofi Sarkodie was ahead of him on the depth chart at right back.

And, in even more meaningless news, he’s my go-to backup left back in football manager.

by Andy Karas on Feb 14, 2012 11:36 AM EST reply actions  

Is it also possible

That we haven’t seen the last of Perry Kitchen at fullback? Granted, he’s never played on the left

by Andy Karas on Feb 14, 2012 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I could see Kitchen at RB

But only in a pinch. Like if Russell and Woolard are both injured or suspended at some point, I think Korb on the left and Kitchen on the right would be the likeliest choice, with Saragosa filling in at CDM

Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..

by Martin Shatzer on Feb 14, 2012 8:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Just joining the forum

The last two articles are really getting me pumped for the new season. Want to thank the writers for their contributions. Well done.

I agree that we could use some more depth for the outside defenders. Of course, with all the central guys we have we can always push Jakovic outside at times. But injuries will happen and we need some more depth.

Overall, management has done a good job making moves. Would like to see that finally show on the field by getting us to the post season.

by eastcoasthawk on Feb 14, 2012 12:31 PM EST reply actions  

Rodney Wallace

Although it ended up being Wallace for DeRo, the Wallace for Dax took our drafted very promising left back that could of been DC’s answer in that position for years. Very unfortunate that we couldn’t keep him.

by dcunitedfan100 on Feb 14, 2012 12:48 PM EST reply actions  

I liked Wallace as much as anybody

But he probably wouldn’t do too well in Olsen’s system as a fullback. He’s a bit of a liability in defense despite his speed, and he’s a turnover waiting to happen (In fact, when Opta first started tweeting random tidbits about MLS last year, one of the very first pieces of trivia involved the fact that Wallace had more misplaced passes than anybody in MLS).

When he has time on the ball, he’s very exciting, especially for a fullback/wingback, but because Olsen wants his FBs to be stay-at-home, defense first players, Wallace’s strengths wouldn’t be properly utilized, and his weaknesses would be put into the spotlight. It was probably best for him and for United that he moved on – he’s done well enough at Portland to work his way into the Costa Rican national team set-up, even.

Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United

by The AMT on Feb 14, 2012 1:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Not sure we have a read on Olsen's preference for outside backs just yet

I don’t think Olsen has had an outside back that can overlap in a way that makes it worth the risk.

The most attack-minded outside backs for us in 2011 were Burch and Korb. Burch was way too slow, and his success as a crosser was always a myth rather than reality (his rate of success in my mind is way, way too low, and it’s all because he needs to have perfect conditions and no pressure to hit a cross). The rare perfect cross, much like his rare free kick goal, doesn’t outweigh the other 15 or so bad crosses.

Sorry, got stuck in an anti-Burch rut.

Korb could actually get forward and help the attack, but doesn’t have the experience yet to judge when best to do so (not to mention some positional deficiencies). He could yet develop into an overlapping threat who actually holds down his position defensively at the same time.

My point is that I think Olsen has preferred stay-at-home outside backs because that’s what he’s had. It’s also strongly influenced by our often makeshift back four, as well as the flimsy nature of our center backs (other than when Jakovic and McDonald both started). We struggled enough as it was, so I can see why Olsen made a pragmatic decision to do as much as possible to help prevent the flow of goals against.

I’m not saying he will embrace overlapping fullbacks if we happen to get one. I’m just saying we haven’t had the right personnel or the right center backs yet to know for sure.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Feb 15, 2012 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Huh

I was just reading the debate they’re having on Stumptown Footy over whether Rodney should be a left back or left midfield. Let’s just say, no one’s overly impressed with his defending.

by Brendanukkah on Feb 14, 2012 2:27 PM EST up reply actions  

He should play midfield

Costa Rica figured that one out right away. His turnovers are too dangerous at left back, and his positioning isn’t up to snuff either. The stakes are too high in the back to take those risks.

At left midfield, though, his speed and direct approach cause problems for defenses, and he has a more than adequate knack for scoring goals considering how little experience he has in front of goal at a high level. His giveaways are still problematic there too, but not nearly as much (especially in Portland’s direct style of play; taking risks and charging forward are part of the deal for Timbers wingers).

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Feb 15, 2012 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Cue second Brazilian?

I still don’t believe DC is done looking for a leftback option. Two deep at every position does not mean Korb covering two positions. Obviously, if on fullback gets injured, we have no depth of any kind at the position. Really makes you wonder about the praise Woollard is getting.

by UnitedDemon on Feb 14, 2012 1:59 PM EST reply actions  

I hope this is the case. But Brazilian fullbacks tend to be a particular type, and that type isn’t always known for its stellar defending. That said, I’m also hoping that Brazilian Trialist the Second is a left-footed defender.

Vamos United | Boiler Up | Support your local club | Keep United in DC
Contributing author for Black & Red United | Ally.

by The AMT on Feb 14, 2012 2:29 PM EST up reply actions  

As we speak

Chris Korb has entered the game against RSL for Daniel Woolard… at left back.

by Brendanukkah on Feb 14, 2012 2:34 PM EST reply actions  

Truth

It’s really the only logical conclusion.

Vamos United | Boiler Up | Support your local club | Keep United in DC
Contributing author for Black & Red United | Ally.

by The AMT on Feb 14, 2012 8:50 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Woolard, our best defender last year? Good Lord, no.

Best left back? Maybe if you discount Zayner’s injury shortened year. I’m not sure what to make of Benny replacing Woolard with Burch, other than he wanted something in the attack from the LB spot. Woolard did struggle at times during the second half of the season, but defending-wise, I think I’d still choose Woolard over Burch, then head straight for a bottle of whiskey. LB has to be one of the hardest positions to fill, if not the hardest. The USMNT has had the same problem. I would love United to find someone to upgrade at the position, but I’m not so sure it’s going to happen. Woolard strikes me as a fine backup in MLS, but he’s not a quality starter. I kinda hope Korb can play on the left, as well. It’d at least give us another option, and I think Korb would join in the attack more.

by madavis on Feb 14, 2012 7:22 PM EST reply actions  

Maybe Benny meant...

our most consistent defender throughout the season. Jakovic was out injured, McDonald struggled a bit down the stretch, and White did the same.

by Karlito Vargas on Feb 14, 2012 8:33 PM EST up reply actions  

This is my read on the situation

He probably made the few biggest disaster-level errors, as well, which given our goals against last year was probably important. He was often involved in widespread defensive breakdowns, but it wasn’t often that Woolard himself gave the team a goal.

For the record, though, I felt Kitchen was our best defender.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Feb 15, 2012 6:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I've got nothing against Woolard as a starter

He’s below average as a starting left back in MLS, but as we get to be above average at more and more positions, I’m okay with that. My chief concern was that we have no one behind him to compete for the starting job or to relieve him in case of suspension or injury. But if today’s preseason game is any indication, maybe Korb can be that guy and we shouldn’t worry too much.

Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..

by Martin Shatzer on Feb 14, 2012 8:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Players do improve

Between Woolard and Korb, there’s certainly the possibility that these guys can step up their game. Being surrounded by better players all around certainly doesn’t hurt.

by rke on Feb 14, 2012 9:08 PM EST reply actions  

What about Dudar as a depth left back?

Looking at FIFA 12 and Dudar has left back listed as another position he can play. In fact, if you transfer Dudar onto United, he automatically gets defaulted to left back Curious if Olsen plans on having him as that option.

by Ted Meyer on Feb 14, 2012 11:37 PM EST reply actions  

Idk, pace would probably be the key issue.

That said, if he shows that he can be penciled in on the depth chart at that position in preseason, then I would not doubt Ben’s judgement in putting him there for open cup or maybe even league matches.

by Karlito Vargas on Feb 15, 2012 1:21 AM EST up reply actions  

We’ve got four MLS starter quality center backs, but only two MLS starter quality outside backs. I agree with you guys. It would be great if one of Jakovic, Dudar, White, or B-Mac could fill in on the left if necessary.

Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..

by Martin Shatzer on Feb 15, 2012 8:19 AM EST up reply actions  

Read nothing about him playing left back with Young Boys

I think he’s a 100% center back. This doesn’t seem like a Brasesco situation where he can play both and his size makes the decision for Olsen.

Of course, I haven’t actually seen him play a real game beyond Youtube highlights, so there’s that.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Feb 15, 2012 6:56 PM EST up reply actions  

From Goff today

“Also, the Insider ”http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/soccer-insider/post/dc-united-training-camp-news-and-notes-dwayne-de-rosarios-contract-mls-salary-cap-trialists/2012/02/16/gIQAgs30HR_blog.html" >has learned the club is planning to look at a left back, where United lacks depth."

by benuski on Feb 16, 2012 1:19 PM EST reply actions  

Hi, Mr. Olsen!

(When he wears a uniform, I still call him Benny. But when he’s got his full Guardiola (or Draper, if you prefer), he morphs into Mr. Olsen.)

Vamos United | Boiler Up | Support your local club | Keep United in DC
Contributing author for Black & Red United | Ally.

by The AMT on Feb 16, 2012 2:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Eddie Johnson just signed on with MLS again, and will go through the allocation process

DC sits at #7 in the Allocation order. Any chance he falls to us, and if so, should we take him?

by Brendanukkah on Feb 16, 2012 2:58 PM EST reply actions  

No

Unless two teams further down the list want him and we want to create a bidding war for his rights , there is no way I want Eddie Johnson anywhere near our roster.

Even that gambit carries the huge risk of ending up stuck with a player who hasn’t been even remotely effective since the middle of the 2007 MLS season.

How ineffective? Since he bolted out of the gates with 13 goals in roughly 15 games in 2007, he has a grand total of 9 goals in roughly 79 games (the “roughly” coming from an inexact memory of when Johnson started to suck in 2007; basically, whenever Fulham’s interest became public, that’s when he stopped trying). 4 different clubs – including 2 in the Championship and 1 Greek 1st division team – have passed on him. Puebla (a team that is on the poorer end of the scale in Mexico) pulled out of signing him because of his fitness. He showed up unfit for what was his last realistic chance at a big contract!

Johnson is ineffective and totally unreliable on the field and simply doesn’t get it off the field. I’d rather we build our starting 11 around Kurt Morsink this season.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Feb 16, 2012 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

To add on

At least Davies was a head case who WANTED to come to MLS and was willing to work hard as long as things went well.

Johnson simply doesn’t give a @#$%.

by UnitedDemon on Feb 17, 2012 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Heh

Really, really happy to see him in Seattle.

by rke on Feb 18, 2012 10:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, I was pretty surprised to see them give up Fucito and Neagle for him

If he works out, fantastic for Sigi and the front office, but this is a head scratcher on the order of trading up to select Marc Burch for me.

by Brendanukkah on Feb 19, 2012 8:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation fan blog in support of D.C. United!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
D.C. United and the upcoming transfer window
Small
DC United Stadium Plans?
Ldg_tuck_small
Playing the "What If?" Game - Bill Hamid
Ldg_tuck_small
Positives from Loss to San Jose
Small
Our Back Line Was Holier Than Sunday Against San Jose.
Small
The Road To Dominance
Mvc-830f_small
What's with the TV matches -- or lack thereof?
Small
Visiting fan seeks guidance
Dsc_0182_small
Want to talk about DCU? Seeking an interview participant!
Small
LA Galaxy lack of travel

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Martin2_small Martin Shatzer

Authors

Hbsc_small ChestRockwell

Fedora_small The AMT

N7601079_33456630_4404_small benuski