D.C. United Approval Ratings: Josh Wolff
We're spending the first month or so of the D.C. United offseason grading each player on the roster with an approval rating. A vote for APPROVE means you were satisfied with the player's performance and want to see him back in D.C. next season. A vote for DISAPPROVE means you want United to move on without him. There is no middle ground, so please leave salary and contract implications out of your decision.
Josh Wolff is often the forgotten member of the D.C. United attack. And yet he had five goals and seven assists while playing in 30 matches, just one off the team lead. Wolff quietly scored as many goals in 2011 as United's leading goalscorer in 2010, tripled the number of assists of the leading assister in 2010, and yet he doesn't get nearly the attention of Dwayne De Rosario, Charlie Davies, Chris Pontius, or Andy Najar.
Wolff does the little things right. Watch his work off the ball and you'll be watching a professor, teaching a lesson in how to be a professional forward.
He's qualified to be the captain, but he's not. That's De Rosario's job, and since De Rosario's had the job, Wolff's importance has faded. He scored only two goals since DeRo's arrival - one in DeRo's first match with D.C., and one a month later against the Chicago Fire. Wait. Did his importance fade? Or did he regress? Wolff is 34. He'll be 35 by First Kick.
Our ideal starting 11 for 2012 doesn't include Wolff. It includes some other unknown striker, probably from a foreign land. And Wolffy becomes a fairly high-priced and very high-experienced substitute. But given his 2011 statistics and form, perhaps he should be more.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Wolff did score in De Ro's debut
But it was De Ro who did the the celebratory dance, and Wolff was relegated to camera man. But he did it cheerfully and welcomed his new teammate. Captain material!
Loved that celebration
Especially fitting since De Ro had done most of the difficult part on that play.
As a big proponent of goal celebrations, I think Wolff is one of the best in MLS. The shirtless leap into RFK was awesome, and he had a few other creative ones.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Jan 6, 2012 2:01 PM EST up reply actions
I was so wrong
My impression of Wolff as of 2010, formed entirely from his limited international play, was not positive. Damn, was I missing a good player all those years.
I have no problem with paying him what he’s being paid to be the #3 forward. It will suit him perfectly. He’s old enough that playing him 90 minutes every week is obviously counterproductive, but he still has enough mobility to make his experience and intelligence count. His season totals for goals and assists in 2012 will probably be the same whether he plays 1500 minutes or 3000 minutes; getting, say, 3 goals and 5 assists, plus excellent teamwork and leadership, from the third forward is worth a lot.
lifted the hex
Wolf’s goal in the first game lifted the foul mood of 2010 and gave us all hope for the new season. Agree that he’s not an every game striker but he definitely has the moxie to contribute this year. Approve.
Surprised
Add me to the list of those surprised by Wolff’s contribution to the team. I think he was crucial to keeping us alive prior to DeRo’s arrival. He was also a big contributor to Davies’ success. Great point about his work off the ball – that kind of selfless effort creates space for others and often leads to unrecognized, “indirect” assists.
At the beginning of the season, I saw him as an odd acquisition, but many said that his arrival was very much Olsen’s doing, so I was curious to see what he brought. Now I see Wolff as actual evidence (as opposed to just wishful thinking) that Benny will bring some savvy to future acquisitions.
Still waiting for this year’s news, of course. but I trust that Olsen will bring more Wolff-like surprises to the roster.
It's been a while
since we’ve had someone with his soccer IQ on the pitch consistently (Olsen himself was the last guy). Not counting DeRo, he was my favorite acquisition last season. His work on and off the ball was great…if only Davies had picked up on this. Hopefully BlakeBrett learns some of Wolff’s ways.
Approve
I was on board for Wolff from the start, mostly because a) Moreno was gone and we had no option at withdrawn forward and b) my favorite quote about soccer is “Football is a game you play with your brain.” Wolff has always been a smart player, and his skills were a good match to what we had at the beginning of the season. It’s no surprise to me that he managed to get so many assists, and those don’t often reflect the number of times his movement opened things up for other players.
In 2012, Wolff’s role will be reduced, but will still be vital. There are a lot of things that tell me we’ll still see plenty of El Lobo:
1. De Ro will be called up for Canada for World Cup qualifying starting in June and happening sporadically throughout the season.
2. Bringing Wolff into a game gives us some different looks. Let’s say we need a goal; you bring Wolff in for Boskovic, move De Ro back, and things change quite a bit for the opponent. We could also use Wolff in place of whoever our new striker will be to play with him and De Ro both underneath, which can confuse defenses (particularly in MLS, where there’s pretty much no such thing as a false 9).
3. There’s also the possibility that Boskovic never quite delivers and is not on the team from July onward. At that point, it would be preferable to use a fresh Wolff over the 2nd half of the season as a starter with De Ro moving to the attacking midfield role. Going out and finding a new playmaker in mid-season runs a lot of risks (how long will he take to fit in? Will he be arriving in offseason shape?), and barring a Gomez-esque miracle, I’d rather not have to go that route.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
"Boskovic never quite delivers"?
Really? Based on his less than 12 months actually playing? I thought he’d started to pay off last year before he was injured. You’re technically correct, but I don’t think it is a fair statement…
by Eric David Ruenes on Jan 6, 2012 8:32 PM EST up reply actions

by 














