2012 Primer: What Shall We Do With... Dwayne De Rosario?
As D.C. United's preseason gets underway, we here at B&RU will look at a few of the team's pieces and how they can and should be used in 2012. Our first installment focused on Chris Pontius and whether he should be used in the midfield or on the forward line. Today, we ask a similar question about defending MLS MVP and Golden Boot winner Dwayne De Rosario.
Has anybody in the history of Major League Soccer ever had half a season like the second half of Dwayne De Rosario's 2011? After coming to United from New York on June 27 in what was unquestionably the Steal of the Year, DeRo scored 13 goals and dished out 7 assists in 18 games, both team highs. If you're following along at home, that was good for an unthinkably high 1.2 goals and assists per 90 minutes, and it adds up to DeRo's having a direct hand in 70% of the team's goals after he arrived from the Red Bulls. He effectively put United on his back and willed the team into the playoff race. Were it not for a couple of late season injuries to Chris Pontius and Dejan Jakovic, there's every likelihood that the Canadian international would have succeeded in leading the Black-and-Red into the postseason for the first time since 2007.
Ever since the day he arrived, though - and really, throughout most of his career - De Rosario has been followed by the question: what is his best position? Is he an attacking midfielder, or is he a forward? Either way, he'll generally look to occupy space between the opposition's midfield and defense, but his starting points, the nature and number of scoring opportunities, and his defensive responsibilities will vary based on which position he takes up.
We've asked the question before, in the context of United's 2011 roster, but let's ask it again: where should De Rosario line up? Arguments, a poll and your comments after the jump.
I won't go point/counterpoint on this post, because I think the question is a lot less close than it is with Pontius. Last year, up until DeRo came along, United were without anybody who could really orchestrate the attack. Dax McCarty can be the engine room of an MLS team, but he's not the string-pulling type. Branko Boskovic began the year out of shape and, once he was fit, got kicked to the point of season-ending injury in an early season Open Cup game, leaving United without his services and eventually leading me to conclude that De Rosario should be primarily deployed in midfield.
But that was last year. This year, we have a Boskovic who - by Ben Olsen's telling - is as fit and driven as he's been since arriving in D.C. two summers ago. Assuming we'll want to play our best players in the starting XI, and further assuming that an in-shape, in-form Boskovic will easily force his inclusion in the lineup, the easiest way to accommodate United's attacking talent will be to put DeRo up top. Otherwise, we put Boskovic out left (where he'll drift inside and not provide the pace or width we need from wide midfielders in Olsen's system) and shift Pontius up top (where I think he can succeed, though he's been more threatening over his young career coming from the wing).
Putting DeRo in midfield also means moving him farther away from goal, which will necessarily reduce the number of chances he'll see. Not just because of the decreased proximity, but also because midfield (even attacking midfield) generally requires a lot more work on defense than forward - shutting down the opposing team's holding midfielder and tracking back to protect the DM and back four uses up a lot of energy, especially for a 33 year old. Last year, it was a necessary evil, as we had nobody else who could effectively play the position; even then, DeRo was often shifted to forward late in games, reducing his defensive responsibilities and allowing him to focus on creating and poaching goals.
In 2012 - barring another catastrophic run of injuries (knock wood) - there's little doubt in my mind that DeRo should - and almost certainly will - spend the buik of his time lined up at forward, underneath another striker. He'll play a free role, giving him license to read what the game needs - he can drop deep and help with possession and buildup or he can stay forward to keep pressure on opposing center backs or he can use a high starting position and drop deep to pull a center back out of position (a tactic that San Jose used against us to perfection at RFK last year).
A free role really only works, though, if the players behind you are solid enough in defense to limit your responsibilities when out of possession. I think that one added layer we get by putting the "free role" on the forward line and not the midfield line is important in this respect. Boskovic gives DeRo that extra little bit of cover to be audacious or to fudge the tactics a little bit in search of an advantage. With DDR, those risks frequently pay off, so you need a system designed to let DeRo be DeRo. Unlike last year (when we leaked goals and had no other attacking midfield options), with United's 2012 roster, we can best do that with him at forward.
That's my take, anyway. Let us hear yours by voting in the poll and giving it to us in the comments.
14 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Assuming Boskovic is adequate or better, De Ro has to be up front
If Boskovic is even in the ballpark of a being a good player, this question won’t be a hard one to answer. I also like the possible temporary shift available if everything works: De Ro drops off the front line, Boskovic shifts out left onto the less congested wing, and Pontius pushes up high. You throw that out there for a couple minutes here and a couple minutes there, and you leave teams with that many more things to consider against an already dangerous group.
If Boskovic ends up being poor, though, we have a tough issue to deal with. De Ro and Wolff worked together pretty well last season, especially in terms of swapping roles. Wolff is hardly a natural midfielder, but he knows where to be on the field and passes pretty well, so he could play underneath De Ro if De Ro decided it was time to move higher up or if Olsen called for it. However, the issue there is relying on a 33 year old who still plays 90 minutes for his national team and a 35 year old with a history of injuries to start.
So what else could we do if De Ro ends up having to play attacking midfield out of necessity? Olsen didn’t try out many formations – other than a 4231 in that final game against Sporting – but that might be exactly what to do if Boskovic doesn’t work out (or more painfully, if he plays just fine but talks to get him an extension break down). In that case, we’d have to use Santos or Brettschneider as a lone forward at least some of the time, with Najar, De Ro, and Pontius playing the attacking midfield roles. That probably means a starting role for King as a linking midfielder between that group and Kitchen in an anchor role. Santos would have to maintain better form than he did in the lone forward role for Dallas and/or Brettschneider will have to grow a bit faster than expected for this to work.
Another option that I don’t really like but would have to be considered would be to move either Pontius or Najar up front and start DeLeon or Cruz on whichever wing is vacated. That’s a tough call, too, because Pontius is the better forward, but Cruz is the better back-up. We might end up with Najar on the left in that case.
Of course, if we bring in one more striker, and he’s awesome, this won’t be such a troublesome problem. The new guy would start with Santos, Wolff, or Brettschneider (determined by form and the needs of the specific game), and he’d replace the goals lost for De Ro by having to play further from goal. That seems unlikely at this point in the preseason, but I’m trying to think of every plausible scenario.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
If - and I truly hope it won't come to this - Boskovic doesn't work out
I really, really, really hope we’re not depending on King to link defense to attack as a regular starter. I don’t think we have anybody else on the roster at the moment that would do better, but I do hope we’d find somebody out in the league/world/RFK parking lot to bring in and play the link role or the creator role.
Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United
In this case, King would just be a conduit between Kitchen and De Ro
I’d agree that it’s not the perfect situation and that we’d need to find a better candidate over the long term, but I don’t think it would be a disaster. King bears a more than passing resemblance to McCarty, who had his best season playing that role in Dallas. It’s probably the ideal place on the field for King; in other words, if he’s going to be a starting-quality player anywhere on the field, it would be in that role.
I doubt we’d end up with that as the formation, especially if Boskovic plays well enough that Olsen doesn’t use Wolff as a starter. I doubt he’ll break down injury-wise if he were to become a starter in July/August and just have a few months to get through.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Jan 30, 2012 6:50 PM EST up reply actions
Trequarista. Si. Si.
The classic No. 10 role seems created for DeRo. It will maximize his touches in the attacking zone. It will maximize use of his passing, dribbling and shooting abilities. If the opposing defensive mid doesn’t cover him, someone from the back line will have to. Either way, it will ease pressure on DCU’s attacking midfielders. When DeRo beats his initial marker on the dribble, the opposing defense will be quite disrupted, leaving gaps for attacking teammates to fill. At this point, DeRo’s passing skill is brought into play. The recipient can attack goal or look for a return to an advancing DeRo, who likely will have shaken his marker. But, as Chest points out, all this depends on Bosco or someone else performing well in central mid.
On this team, DeRo needs to play forward
I’ve changed my mind on this since last year, primarily because when this question came up last year 1) we had Charlie Davies up top (ok, I assumed he’d be a little more effective) and 2) we had no other good option at attacking mid to pull the strings. This year we have Boskovic, and our talent pool at forward is no better than last year. So, on this team, DeRo at forward fills a need, and he doesn’t have to play attacking mid for lack of better options (we hope).
All things being equal, and if we had a strong stable of forwards, I would prefer DeRo at attacking mid, linking the defense to the attack and setting up goal scoring opportunities. He’s a maestro with the ball at his feet, maximize his touches and all that. But all things are not equal, and on this team, DeRo needs to be up top.
Didn't expect this to be so one-sided
On a related note, I hate the idea that the ability of this team to be successful will hinge on “DeRo being DeRo”. It’s like we’re gambling the entire season on a 34-year old attacker not slowing down.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
I don't know that the entire season hinges on it
But when you get a player of De Rosario’s caliber, your best options are likely to involve putting him at the center of your plans, right up until he actually slows down. Luckily, a lot of our pre-existing pieces have shown an ability to work very well with DeRo – Najar and Pontius, in particular, combined with him very well last year wherever he lined up, as did Wolff.
Your point is well taken, though, and I think it redoubles the point of the post (and the 88% of poll voters) that he should be used as a forward this year, and not a midfielder. Besides reducing wear and tear on the MVP, putting him at forward gives Boskovic the reins to the midfield, which he’ll be able to play (and hopefully contribute at a high level) even if DeRo is forced to miss time for one reason or another. I think if the pieces click together like we think they’ll be able to, United could have a really elite attack this year; take DeRo out, and we could still have a decent MLS offense with Boskovic back in the picture. The real do-or-die spot on the field is probably the defense, really. If they bring down the goals allowed appreciably, we could be in for a fun ride. If we see another year of the sieve, though, it might not matter how many goals we score come playoff time.
Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United
A comparison
Jaime Moreno had 10 goals and 10 assists in 2008. Then 9 goals and 3 assists in 2009. Then 2 goals and 0 assists in 2010. I don’t think we’re going to see a huge dropoff for DeRo this year, but its reasonable to predict that we will see a dropoff at some point. We just have to hope its a gradual one.
And its alarming how much we would have to rely on the midfield to score goals if De Rosario does underperform or suffer a major injury.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
by Martin Shatzer on Jan 30, 2012 8:41 PM EST up reply actions
One crucial difference
De Ro has never had major, career-threatening back surgery. Moreno’s career was always going to be shorter than it could have been after something like that.
You’re right though: We’re more or less boned if De Ro gets a bad injury or suddenly turns into an old man. Either Boskovic would have to step up with a David Ferreira MVP-caliber season, or we’d have to go out and find a star forward (if this were a movie, such an event would be dismissed as deus ex machina nonsense).
So yeah, our eggs are mostly in one basket.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Jan 31, 2012 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
It occurs to me
That the voting in this poll is almost exactly opposite the same poll back in September. Right now, the voting here is at 88-11 forward; back then, the vote ended 84-15 for midfield.
Amazing what a difference an offseason and little bit of roster turnover make.
Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United
An offseason, a little bit of roster turnover...
and an MVP award, to be precise.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
by Martin Shatzer on Jan 30, 2012 8:24 PM EST up reply actions
Not so much of a gamble in my book
This might sound cavalier, but when I look at De Ro now, he reminds me a lot of Preki at this age. Few players look after themselves as well (side note: this is not an endorsement of his vegan diet). Preki played as a starter without any physical issues until he was about 40 (his last season, at 41, was a bit less easy for him).
I think we’re OK for at least a year or two.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Jan 30, 2012 7:04 PM EST up reply actions
We can't forget that a new contract is needed for more than a year
by Runningcloud on Jan 31, 2012 8:42 AM EST up reply actions
Hope MLS doesn't screw it up for us

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Jan 31, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions

by 















