Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: 'You Just Have to Put Him to Sleep'

2012 Primer: What Shall We Do With... Chris Pontius?

The loss of Chris Pontius for the last several games of 2011 all but doomed D.C. United's playoff hopes. With new reinforcements coming on the wings, is now the time to move CP-13 from midfield to forward?

As D.C. United's preseason gets underway, we here at B&RU will look at a few of the team's pieces and how they can and should be used in 2012. Today, we kick the series off with fourth-year forward/midfielder Chris Pontius.

Let's rewind our mental DVRs to September 10 of last year. D.C. United spent fourteen imperious minutes to rush out to a two-goal lead at the Home Depot Center, both scored by Charlie Davies and created by Chris Pontius. Just past the hour mark, United struck on the counter, again through Davies by way of Pontius. On two of his three assists - and arguably on all three - Pontius gave up pretty solid shooting opportunities to the benefit of his (now former) teammate. Of course, just a minute after United's third goal, Pontius went into an awkward and ill-advised challenge that would break his leg and end his season.

Pontius is scheduled to resume full training March 1, just days before United's season opener March 10. While he is unlikely to feature in that first game against Sporting Kansas City, Pontius will inevitably return to D.C.'s first XI. In the meantime, United's newly acquired depth on the wings will have a chance to make its mark, and the team remains thin at forward (even with a new signing and incoming trialist). This has led some to call - including in the comments of several posts here at B&RU - for Pontius to move from midfield to forward. So let's look at the arguments and decide what we think: Should Pontius line up out left or up top once he sees the field in 2012?

We'll have it out after the jump.

Star-divide

Why he should stay at midfield:

Chris Pontius has become one of MLS's top left midfielders, scoring seven goals from the wing last year. His pace has allowed him to put opposing fullbacks on their heels, and he is admirably two-footed, allowing him to send in crosses from deep on the left or to cut inside onto his laser-rocket of a right foot. Wide midfield is #13's avowed favorite spot on the field, and the space he's provided on the flanks allows him to run at opponents. He typically lines up a bit higher and wider than Andy Najar, his counterpart on the right, providing the width that allows our conservative left fullbacks to stay at home and maintain the team's defensive shape. The nature of his injury shows his dedication - if not always his aptitude - to the defensive phase of the game, a necessity for wide players in any flavor of 4-4-2.

It's not clear that Pontius is the lead-the-line sort of forward United are looking for. With Charlie Davies on the team, Pontius could drop underneath and play provider, as in the Chivas USA game. Of course, that deep-lying forward position is already well looked after by Dwayne De Rosario and Josh Wolff. While our depth at wide midfielder is certainly improved by United's recent moves, it's not "there" yet, and moving our top left midfielder to another position will expose how thin we remain on the left wing.

Why he should move to forward:

Remember that three goal outburst at Chivas USA? Those three assists from Chris Pontius? Well, he lined up at forward in that game, with Dwayne De Rosario playing the attacking midfielder and Santino Quaranta on the left. Pontius showed in that game, and throughout the rest of the second half of last season, that he has an instinctual understanding with DeRo, who we have presumed will line up primarily as a second striker in 2012. Putting him in closer proximity to United's primary creator will only help foster their understanding.

Perhaps one of the better reasons to have Pontius to lead the line is his improved finishing. In fact, it might be argued that the UCSB product has become one of MLS' most clinical finishers - according to MLSsoccer.com's Climbing the Ladder column, Pontius ranks among the top five in the league at converting "big chances" (those where a player might reasonably expected to score). Putting him closer to goal will increase the number of clear cut chances he gets and improve his goal totals to go along with his developing efficiency.

Pontius's skill set will translate well to the forward line, where pace, determination and work rate are all just as useful as they are out wide. The better-than-average aerial presence he's displayed at times will also be more useful at striker.

The verdict:

I, for one, am somewhat undecided. At this point, I think we should withhold judgment until we see how Pontius's recovery goes and how Nick DeLeon, Maicon Santos (or whoever the First Kick starters happen to be) handle themselves. Pontius' versatility will allow us to deploy him wherever we need him. With the current state of the roster, it's not at all unlikely that he'll end up a striker for the 2012 campaign; if Ben Olsen & co. manage to bring home a proper starting forward, though, we'll have more leeway to shift Pontius back out to the left. In any event, the Black-and-Red are still at least a few pieces away (and at more than just left midfield and striker) from being able to call themselves truly deep.

Now it's your turn. Vote in the poll, and let us hear it in the comments - where should Chris Pontius line up this year, once he's healthy enough to see the field?

Poll
Where should Chris Pontius primarily line up for D.C. United in 2012?
Midfield/wing
56 votes
Forward
35 votes

91 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nice to be flexible

Don’t forget Boskovic – if Pontius goes forward and DeRo drops back to AM, that leaves Branko to move out left. I wouldn’t call that thin!

In any case though, this is all shuffling top talent behind our TBD front man. I see Pontius as our steady LM with the flexibility to move forward when it suits the situation. Nice for Benny to have that option, but we still need to see who is going to take Charlie’s place…

by rke on Jan 22, 2012 9:19 PM EST reply actions  

If..... If DCU found a top CAM....

If the team came up with someone better suited to run the central midfield, I’d be cool with Boskovic moving out to the left wing….in which case, of course, Pontius moves up top.

Having said that, I think last season proved Olsen correct when he said that left wing was Pontius’ best position. I always say that, looking at Pontius, I think he’s got the prototypical striker’s body…a lot like Robbie van Persie. HOwever, whenever I see Pontius play up top, his finishing doesn’t match what I think he should be capable of doing. When he’s right in front of goal, he seems either to shoot the ball right at the goalie or he misses the frame completely. He seems to lack the finesse to to put the ball where he wants with such tight angles. Working farther out, counter-intuitively, may make things easier for Chris.

Another reason why he may be more effective farther out is that he is very quick on the dribble with the ball at his feet — and this skill is maximized on the wing. I"m not thrilled with our stable of forwards, but with DCU’s current roster, I think Pontius is more valuable on the wing, regardless of what his best position might be.

by fischy on Jan 22, 2012 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

DeRo is not Suited for CAM?!?!?

Seriously?!?

Pontius feeding a true target forward, DeRo in the middle, and Bosko (if healthy) on the left is a pretty darn good lineup

by BrunoReturns on Jan 23, 2012 3:40 PM EST up reply actions  

You have a point, but...

I think last year showed that DeRo is most effective as a withdrawn forward. I don’t watn to play two guys out of position, if we can slot both of htem in their best position. While I agree Pontius looks like a target forward, he has never been a good finisher up top…for whatever reason.

by fischy on Jan 23, 2012 4:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm with fischy on this one

The key line is:

Working farther out, counter-intuitively, may make things easier for Chris.

It does not make sense, but it is the reality. Pontius is excellent at some very specific things, both of which involve facing goal and moving at speed. The prototypical Chris Pontius goals involves cutting in from the left (between the right back and right-center back) and curling the ball to the far post.

In front of goal, getting the kind of opportunities that fall to a poacher, Pontius has not been very effective. He isn’t an accurate header of the ball, and his first-time shooting has been a problem. That’s much different than cutting in past someone or running onto a through ball, where Pontius will get some touches to set his shot up for himself.

This is why the “big chances” stat can be misleading; it’s not specific enough, because there are all kinds of big chances.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Jan 24, 2012 12:55 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that it may be counterintuitive, but it does make sense – I made a similar argument about Dax McCarty’s positioning (though within the central portion of the field) last year: that some players are better to the team farther from goal.

I think it’s very likely that Pontius is a better winger/midfielder than a forward. What worries me is that we may find ourselves in a situation where our best combination involves Pontius at forward and DeLeon (or somebody else) at left mid. If Santos or another pick-up manages to be a good, starter-quality forward, then the likelihood of this decreases, but right now, we’re one bad tackle away from being very, very thin up front.

Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United

by The AMT on Jan 24, 2012 10:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Not ideal, but we can make do with Santos from now until the summer window

Santos is perfectly capable of being an acceptable target forward for us, provided he understands that his role is to compliment De Ro, Najar, Pontius, and Boskovic. If he’s willing to be a worker who primarily focuses on helping the high-end talents we have elsewhere rather than thinking of himself as the goalscorer who that group lives to serve, we should have a good offense.

It’s not the ideal set-up, obviously; that would be finding a target man who can do that job as well as being a deadly goalscorer himself, but that seems unlikely at this late stage. Maybe it’s a summer move (Goff said we’re targeting Europe, after all).

Where the goals come from isn’t that important, as long as they are consistently being scored by someone. If De Ro is amongst the top scorers again, and both Najar and Pontius can combine for 12+ again, we will probably be just fine as an attack (especially if Santos can get above 7 or so, if Boskovic adds some goals, if Brettschneider continues to grow, and if Wolff can chip in a few).

I know for a lot of fans, signing a forward to be the new Emilio is the sole way of determining if we had a good or bad offseason. I just hope everyone’s open to there being many ways to build a successful team.

Stray thought: What if signing a star striker would mean having to release Boskovic? And what if Boskovic lives up to his billing/resume/performance against the Revs in the Open Cup? That would be a very tough call to make today, but obviously there’s a lot of soccer to play until then.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Jan 24, 2012 6:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Re: the stray thought

I like this thought experiment: would you rather (a) forego a better-than-Santos option at forward and keep Boskovic, risking the fact that he might not ever regain his top form, OR (b) sign a promising foreign talent at forward, who looks like he could be The Next Emilio, and release Boskovic?

For me, unless it’s Drogba we’re talking about, I think I take option A. Reports on Branko are good so far (staying in town for the off-season, coming into camp in top shape, having drive), and we know he’s got the vision and the ability to be a game-changer. Having him behind DeRo and between Pontius and Najar – makes me feel pretty good, almost no matter who the other forward is. (Hell, I’d even be good with Ngwenya in that set-up.) It might be that I’m risk-averse, or it might be that I value string-pullers more than strikers, but I like the chances that DeRo and Boskovic can combine well and run the attack enough that given the (right now imaginary) choice between Boskovic or a new striker, I’m really likely to take the known quantity.

Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United

by The AMT on Jan 24, 2012 7:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Summer

With Boskovic signed for half a season more and European transfers opening in the summer, the answer seems obvious.

But we could all be looking back by then, wondering why we ever doubted Boskovic. He’s a DP after all, currently in good health, excellent vision and skill, given recent praise by Olsen, with over a year of learning the ways of MLS behind him. Sometimes I feel like our expectations are exceedingly low for a guy who could well take this league by storm.

No guarantees, of course, but it could be that our superstar signing is the guy we’ve had all along.

by rke on Jan 24, 2012 11:58 PM EST up reply actions  

A fan of Pontius up top.

Bringing in Cruz helps. We’ve got so many midfield options to shuffle, especially if DeLeon delivers the way we’d hope.

Right now, this is a possibility.

Wolff/Santos, De Ro
Bosko Najar Cruz
Kitchen
Woollard McD Jakovic Russell

And you know what, that isn’t half bad.

Now, you might question whether Najar would be our playmaker when we’ve got Bosko and De Ro (simple, De Ro’s better at forward, and Bosko plays left for Montenegro). I’d also argue he’s the more tenacious option on defensively.

But what it comes down to is, we don’t have a young, strong attacker capable of playing that position as well as Pontius. He’s been put there before, but he’s evolved greatly since then. I’d like to see tried from first kick, see what happens now that the cards are reshuffled.

by UnitedDemon on Jan 22, 2012 11:19 PM EST reply actions  

Switch Najar and Boskovic and we can talk

Boskovic only plays wide left for Montenegro because they play a very cautious 442 that requires 2 holding midfielders. He’s good enough that they can’t leave him out, but the team itself can’t defend well enough without the extra shielding presence in midfield. Thus, Boskovic plays from the left for Montenegro (meaning that he drifts inside when they attack) rather than as a true left midfielder.

Playing Najar on the left isn’t ideal, but Andy doesn’t seem too bothered by it when Olsen asks for the in-game wing switch (which happens pretty much every game). Playing centrally would rob Najar of the open space that he uses so well, which takes away his primary way of attacking opposing teams.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Jan 24, 2012 12:58 AM EST up reply actions  

I prefer Pontius on the wing

Pontius is most dangerous when he is coming at goal from that left wing, where he can pull he cut toward goal move and fire off a shot or a shortened cross. It’s Cristiano Ronaldo-esque without all the insane talent and Lain flair. He can do this as a forward as well, but I still have nightmares about United’s forwards, seemingly left to squalor during the last half of last season; DeRo The Great © excepted. Hell, Pontius may be great up top, but I worry about him getting less time on the ball if he plays forward. Remember how many games Charlie Davies disappeared in last year? It wasn’t always his fault, but it did happen, and I’d hate for that to happen to Chris.

I still say our best lineup has Pontius and Najar on the wings with DeRo as the withdrawn forward. We’re one legit forward away from having a very dangerous attacking front 4. And if Baskovic turns it on this year at CAM, watch out. Of course, the “one forward away” is the hard part, and the reason we’re having this discussion to begin with.

by madavis on Jan 23, 2012 12:39 AM EST reply actions  

I voted midfield but...

You’re really close to convincing me that he’d make a good forward.

If Pontius gets moved up top though, I don’t envision De Rosario playing behind him. I envision the two of them playing the same top line in a more traditional 4-4-2 than the one we used most of last year, with Najar and DeLeon/Cruz on the wings, and Boskovic and Kitchen in the middle. Rather than forcing either DeRo or CP13 to play a "target forward" role, they would each have the flexibility to play off each other and find/attack the open spaces. Similar to how the Davies-Pontius combination worked against Chivas last year, I could see this working quite well against slower opponents.

Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..

by Martin Shatzer on Jan 23, 2012 1:58 PM EST reply actions  

I personally don’t link DeRo up top as the best option.

DeRo as a forward is great for DeRo, he creates opportunities for himself and finishes them. DeRo as a CAM creates opportunities for everyone.

Maybe I am wrong, but isn’t that the position he played when he won 4 cups for SJ/Houston?

by BrunoReturns on Jan 23, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions  

It's not so simple as just looking at where he used to play

Much like the Boskovic example above, where someone played with a totally different group of players and under a different tactical approach can’t be used to assume that the same thing will work everywhere.

Those Dynamo teams always fielded 2 back-to-goal, big, physical strikers, because Kinnear likes to play direct and fire in a ton of crosses. With De Ro underneath those guys, he still got a ton of the ball – more than Brad Davis, for example – from their knockdowns and hold-up play.

Here, Olsen is trying to make us less direct. Even when we do go very direct, the ball is kept on the ground, and we try to use speed rather than size. That means little to no hold-up play, which means trying to balance the positive (De Ro’s ability to hit the long, deadly through ball) against the negative (moving De Ro into the midfield means we’re moving the MLS Golden Boot winner further from goal).

For this United team, with our tactical preferences and assuming we’re at full strength, De Ro is more useful to us up front – especially since he can be given even more tactical freedom there – than he is in midfield. However, if Boskovic is unavailable or doesn’t meet a certain (pretty high) standard, we then have to look at moving De Ro back to the midfield.

It’s a good problem to have, at least.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Jan 24, 2012 1:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Historical Patterns

For me, the pattern here is the team with no other option (due to injury, etc) moves their best player to the front line, even though he is better suited to controlling the match from the center of the field.

We’ve seen it with DeRo in Houston near the end, again in Toronto, and here last year. Additionally there is Joseph in NE, and other examples. The move is usually very good for that player (in terms of goal scoring), but the team flounders and loses more games than they win because the team’s best player is not controlling more of the game.

by BrunoReturns on Jan 25, 2012 9:43 AM EST up reply actions  

Isolated examples

In Houston, the strength in midfield (Holden was there during De Ro’s last Dynamo season) and weakness at forward made it the right move.

With Toronto, goals cure (or at least cover for) a lot of ailments. I don’t think moving De Ro forward hurt them; they had more control over games in terms of possession with him in midfield, but they weren’t scoring many goals and their defense still let up too many to make that possession worthwhile.

The Revs were desperate, and Nicol rolled the dice on Joseph playing as a forward. It ended up just shuffling the problem from goal-scoring to possession, as you point out. In the end, I don’t think the Revs were worse or better with Joseph up front; it ended up just re-arranging the deck chairs as the ship sunk.

In our case, we have a good midfield, and De Ro drops off the front line enough that he contributes a lot to our possession. If Boskovic plays well enough, there’s no reason to move De Ro back into the midfield (which would also mean moving Boskovic and Pontius to less-preferred positions).

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Jan 25, 2012 7:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I actually voted midfield, too

Pontius has the tools to be a forward, and if the team needs him there, I think he’ll be able to produce. But he’s a better midfielder than he is a forward, and he’s admittedly more comfortable out wide, to boot. If he has to stand in at forward once in a while, A+, but I imagine he’ll be spending most of his time on the left, where he’s been scoring goals since literally his first game in the league.

With this post, I really wanted to get people who strongly feel that he should be at one position or the other to think about why they feel that way. I think it’s probably a closer call than a lot of people let on, especially given the current shape of United’s roster.

Vamos United; Boiler Up
Support your local club.
Black & Red United

by The AMT on Jan 24, 2012 10:29 AM EST up reply actions  

One note on the Chivas USA game

This game is oft-cited as Exhibit A for Pontius to be moved up front, but it was misleading for a couple of reasons:

1. Due to injuries and suspensions, Chivas had no available center backs (even emergency-only center backs) with anything above glacial speed. This is a disaster against a team with our speed and on the huge HDC field. I publicly begged for United to do everything to take advantage, and Ben Olsen one-upped even what I would have done by going all in with a high-speed forward pairing.

The problem with all of that is that the Chivas back four – aided by Methuselah Simon Elliot in front of them – may have been the slowest back four sent out by an MLS team in years. It was great to take the 3 points that night, but we have to put that game in proper context: A fluke confluence of problems for our opponent that happened to all directly benefit our strengths.

2. Despite lining up as a forward, Pontius spent a lot of that game drifting to both wings. It worked just fine with Quaranta playing more narrow as a left midfielder, but it still underlined where Pontius wants to start his runs from.

Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC

by ChestRockwell on Jan 24, 2012 1:19 AM EST reply actions  

I agree that it really depends on how the rest of the team works out… if mid left seems covered by new recruits I wouldn’t be opposed to seeing him move up. I think as long as he recovers fully to his peak condition from last year he should be more than capable of handling a fwd position.

by brian.h on Jan 24, 2012 1:58 PM EST reply actions  

I always prefered Pontuis out on the wing

I feel like even though he has a rocket of shot, he just feels more comfortable out on the wing.

However, DCU has Boskovic, Najar, DeLeon, and Cruz so if DCU doesn’t sign anymore forwards, I wouldn’t complain if Pontuis played up front.

I guess ideally, I’d play Pontuis out on the wing with Santos and DeRo up front.

I pretty sure all this has been said but I’m too lazy to read through all the comments.

by Zach J on Jan 25, 2012 8:31 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation fan blog in support of D.C. United!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
DC United Stadium Plans?
Ldg_tuck_small
Playing the "What If?" Game - Bill Hamid
Ldg_tuck_small
Positives from Loss to San Jose
Small
Our Back Line Was Holier Than Sunday Against San Jose.
Small
The Road To Dominance
Mvc-830f_small
What's with the TV matches -- or lack thereof?
Small
Visiting fan seeks guidance
Dsc_0182_small
Want to talk about DCU? Seeking an interview participant!
Small
LA Galaxy lack of travel
Dtom_small
Fantasy MLS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Martin2_small Martin Shatzer

Authors

Hbsc_small ChestRockwell

Fedora_small The AMT

N7601079_33456630_4404_small benuski