Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Mark Zuckerberg For Spurs, A Campaign

United's stadium situation on front page of WashPo


Steve Goff got United's stadium situation onto the front page (A1!) of the Washington Post. For those who have been following the situation for years, it doesn't say anything groundbreaking, but if you want to hear what the general DC populace thinks, then the comments are a must read.

My impression is that DC residents are (a) skeptical about any plans for a new stadium and (b) misinformed about United's proposals, both of which are highly understandable. The Nationals deal has bred a lot of skepticism for pro sports and sports ownership both. If Will Chang is hoping for a groundswell of support for keeping DC in the District, it looks like it's going to have to start with die-hard United fans.

Comment 3 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Public perception

The misunderstandings about the proposal are rooted in simple lack of information for the most part, but I can’t help thinking that the coverage from the Post’s Metro desk also contributed during the Poplar Point days. United’s proposal was constantly portrayed by David Nakamura and Marc Fisher as one where the city would have to fund the building of a stadium. Intentionally or not, they misrepresented some facts and treated other things that were outright false as true. It didn’t play the same part that the disaster that was the Nats stadium deal did, but it contributed.

The newest article, thankfully, doesn’t involve those two. It also doesn’t present anything new, though Goff did sit down and interview Kevin Payne on the subject. The lack of new info tells me that either a) no progress has been made or b) United is still trying desperately to keep everything as close to the vest. Hopefully it’s the latter.

It is disappointing to read how many non-United fans misunderstand the issue, and the process of getting a stadium built in general. In the public mind, it’s always that the team pays 100% for the stadium privately, or it’s like they’re robbing the public coffers. The comments there also contain numerous people declaring that United can play in a 5-6k minor league baseball park because that’s the perception of our crowds. On the other hand, I’d say the majority of internet comments – not you guys, y’all are cool – are dumb on every subject, so maybe it’s not as bad as it seems.

One thing I was disappointed by was that the article didn’t touch on Will Chang’s attempts to create an ownership group. I know either he or Payne said a while ago that they weren’t related, but I simply cannot bring myself to believe that. An influx of new capital, new (and better) local connections, and new ideas would seem to me to be crucial to the stadium process.

Bottom line: We’re exactly where we were months ago. Goff’s old “zzzzzzzzz” joke is still valid, unfortunately.

by ChestRockwell on May 13, 2011 4:09 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation fan blog in support of D.C. United!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
DC United Stadium Plans?
Ldg_tuck_small
Playing the "What If?" Game - Bill Hamid
Ldg_tuck_small
Positives from Loss to San Jose
Small
Our Back Line Was Holier Than Sunday Against San Jose.
Small
The Road To Dominance
Mvc-830f_small
What's with the TV matches -- or lack thereof?
Small
Visiting fan seeks guidance
Dsc_0182_small
Want to talk about DCU? Seeking an interview participant!
Small
LA Galaxy lack of travel
Dtom_small
Fantasy MLS

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Martin2_small Martin Shatzer

Authors

Hbsc_small ChestRockwell

Fedora_small The AMT

N7601079_33456630_4404_small benuski