Julius James Cut By D.C. United
After a full offseason of positive moves that made the fanbase very happy – drafting the top rated player with the No. 3 pick, trading for one National Team player and adding another out of nowhere through the allocation process, cutting ties with lots of unproductive players – D.C. United has finally made a move that has us scratching our heads.
Julius James was waived today.
James was by most accounts the best defender on United’s roster last season. This very community even voted him for the Popie Award by a wide margin. He plays central defender the way a defender should: strong, fast, consistent, quick-thinking. James also has a bit of a knack for heroics – His two most recent goals each came in the final 10 minutes of a match – one to give United a victory on the road against Toronto FC last season, and one to come within a few minutes of earning D.C. a playoff appearance in 2009.
But none of that was enough, apparently. Despite having only 28 players in camp, United doesn’t have room on its roster for a proven 26-year old defender making $61,000 a year.
It looks as if James had dropped down the depth chart this season, as Rodrigo Brasesco and Perry Kitchen have been playing with the first team at center back, and with Dejan Jakovic still having a great deal of potential despite his disappointing 2010 season. But even as the fourth ranked center back on the roster, and even at $61K, James isn’t a bad guy to have around. Its never a bad thing to have four capable center backs. Meanwhile, we have seven players competing for playing time in central midfield.
I’m probably wrong, but the thought occurred to me that there could be more to this move than just financial reasons. Why waive the guy the day after flying him to California? Just like how the team cut Barry Rice the same day that players reported for duty in D.C. for the first time. It smells a little bit. Did James break a team rule or something?
On the bright side, waiving Julius James and trading an international roster spot to the Los Angeles Galaxy for allocation money could be a sign that United is preparing for something else bigger. Like a goalkeeper. Or a veteran center back. Maybe we’re not done yet afterall.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Only thing I can think was that it became clear to James he would not be a regular starter and asked to leave the club so he could try to go somewhere he could contribute more.
That was my intial thought when I heard the news.
I do remember last year in the 4-0 season opener in KC, after he came on sometime in the first half, he was the lone standout in an otherwise dud of a game for D.C.’s backline.
I know we’ve got serious questions at the center of defense, so maybe I should start the “We Must Sign Julius James” bandwagon now. He’s still got a lot left in the tank, no?
The Daily Wiz - SB Nation's home for Sporting Kansas City fans - Follow me on Twitter @TheDailyWizKC @KCsince88
by Andy Edwards on Feb 17, 2011 7:55 PM EST up reply actions
James could definitely start for KC
Objectively, I see a defense for KC that needs a lot of work (even if they sign Julio Cesar, who is a pretty good player but may or may not adjust to the more, shall we say, rustic approach that MLS often involves). I’d start James over Besler or Thomas in a second.
by ChestRockwell on Feb 17, 2011 8:14 PM EST up reply actions
I was never a fan of James but this was kinda harsh.
He had his best season last season, but for Julius James, thats not saying a whole lot. I figured James would have been waived way before he started playing well. BUT, I feel like Burch should be next on the chopping block, if anyone. Oh well, gotta keep moving forward.
Here’s to hoping Brasesco is the real deal!
Less competition at LB
James had apparently dropped to fourth on the depth chart at CB. Even though they make similar money, Burch is still #1 at the LB spot far as I can tell.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekend Writer for SBNation DC.
by Martin Shatzer on Feb 17, 2011 9:19 PM EST up reply actions
Puzzling move
Maybe it is as spidergoose suggests, that James asked to leave once it appeared that he’d be behind the three apparent frontrunners. Last season, James made comments alluding to being disappointed that Onalfo didn’t regard him as a starter; perhaps having the same lack of trust from his coach this time around was enough to make him want to leave.
I’ve had a few hours to think about the move, and the best thing I can think of to say is that Ethan White is somewhat similar in style to James. Both are fast, strong, determined defenders that are best in 1v1 situations and rely more on their physical talents. If Olsen regards White as a younger James, then keeping both is kind of redundant.
What this signals to me is a shift in defensive style. James was much better at reactionary defending – diving in to block shots at the last moment, snuffing out dangerous opportunities with a last-ditch tackle, etc. He wasn’t as skilled at seeing far enough ahead of the play to never allow the danger in the first place. Those traits must be what Olsen is looking for, and a player like Kitchen should fit that mold (Brasesco, I have no idea on). James was also less of a ball-playing defender, and that can disrupt your possession game. Teams figure out very quickly which defender(s) are uncomfortable with the ball and will funnel play to whoever that is in an effort to create cheap chances.
I’m kind of arguing against myself here, because I liked James and wanted him to stay on. He had his flaws, obviously, but he was also pretty reliable. When you have someone disaster-prone like Jakovic, you need someone with the kind of speed, athleticism, and bravery that James had alongside him to put the fires out.
At his cap number, even the weaknesses and arguments I made against James don’t explain this decision. I’m inclined to think that spidergoose is on to something, and that James wanted to leave to find a starting job elsewhere. If that’s not the case, then I have to regard this move as a mistake. It’s not like we’ve got a full 30 man roster and we had to cut someone to make room for another player.
Sigh. The only sad move of the offseason.
Oh well. I’m getting much more excited for the new season than I thought I would. It will be especially fun trying to watch MLS from Europe since I’m still in Copenhagen until late May.
A Capital Wasteland - art & hockey from Washington, D.C.
spidergoose theory
I think it makes sense that James would ask to leave, if it looked like he wasn’t going to get the starting job. You would like to see guys fight to get that starting job back rather than jump ship, but this is all speculation. We really don’t know what happened. Of course (speculating still), if he did want to jump ship instead of fighting to get his job back, it makes all the sense in the world that Ben Olson would let him go. “Everyone’s fighting for their job” seems to be the theme of this United off season.
Also United has a good track record lately of not forcing guys to play here if they don’t want to, such as Perkins after 2007.
Could also be they done JJ wrong. Hard to say.
by spidergoose on Feb 18, 2011 11:15 AM EST up reply actions

by 















