D.C. United Roster Status: Keepers, Right Backs, And Center Backs
During the 2010-11 offseason, D.C. United was after literally any player who was halfway competent. Ben Olsen and Dave Kasper built a team that more or less met expectations; at full strength, the team was probably good enough to snatch one of the last playoff spots, but a couple of key injuries were too much to overcome.
This offseason, United has justifiably raised the bar. If competence was the only quality the club was looking for, then most of the nine players released before the Re-Entry Draft would have been kept. In 2012, it's safe to say that the demands are going to be much higher. I think we'd all agree that making the playoffs for the first time since 2007 would be nice, but let's be honest: At this club, "making the playoffs" is just one step along the way. When there are four stars on your chest, you have to aspire to be more than barely above average.
Now that the unwanted or ill-fitting players gone, it's time to stock the roster. Given that the current squad is comprised of just 18 players, additions are a must. Most of the recent cuts were to second-choice players, but the new guys can't just be reliable depth. The scouting trips all over the world and the trips to watch top college players in person during the NCAA tournament have to unearth players ready to make a big impact in MLS this season as well as guys that can provide a spark off the bench.
With that in mind, we'll be taking a look at each position in Olsen's 442. The goal will be to look at what we have and use that figure out what we need to add in order to become a real contender.
I should clarify the format I'll be using. Players will be listed in order of ability at that position alone (not in terms of their overall value). A player in italics is a player capable of playing the position in question, but not a natural at the role.
KEEPERS:
Bill Hamid, Joe Willis
This one's pretty straightforward. Hamid, again called into camp for the national team, is the undisputed No. 1. He'll be spending plenty of time with the USMNT and Olympic teams, but there should be little doubt about where he'll stand when he's available.
Willis turned out to be surprisingly good depth for a guy taken 50th overall and out of a University of Denver program not known for churning out MLS talent. He'll get a relatively high number of meaningful games this season with Hamid almost certain to make the Olympic team on top of his senior national team duty. For a second-choice keeper, Willis is reasonably skilled by MLS standards and looks like he has good upside to boot. Being under the tutelage of Pat Onstad - who has a similar build but was less athletic than Willis in his playing days - will be key.
A third GK is a must, especially with the amount of time Hamid will be unavailable. The draft seems like an obvious route, but I also wouldn't mind seeing United find a veteran willing to work cheaply for this job if we can afford that luxury. It wouldn't be a problem for me if Willis is being pushed for time, and we do have to acknowledge the fact that Hamid is already on the radar of West Bromwich Albion after his training stint there. A good showing at the Olympics could see him become the first United academy player to make the jump to Europe. That would leave us very inexperienced if we're carrying Willis and a draft pick, and the pile of cash we'd make from Hamid can't be stacked in the goalmouth to block shots.
RIGHT BACKS:
Robbie Russell, Perry Kitchen, Chris Korb, Ethan White, Andy Najar, Stephen King
Russell was acquired on the cheap to be our starting right back, a job opened up by Kitchen's full-time move to defensive midfielder. I'm on the record as being very positive about Russell, who will add soccer IQ, experience, professionalism, and the kind of winning mentality that this club needs more of. Russell will also add a bit more going forward than we had last year, which is an underrated plus.
Kitchen proved to be very stable at right back, but he did have to play the role very conservatively to mask his inexperience there. Between the fact that defensive midfield is a more crucial role and the availability of a reasonable back-up in Korb, it will probably be a long time before we see Kitchen at right back again.
Korb is the No. 2 at this point, and that seems like an acceptable proposition for both him and the team. Where he needs to improve is the mental side of things; Korb needs to do better at maintaining the team's shape and staying connected to the players around him, while also maintaining a more consistent level of focus. Still, for a 2nd year pro, you can do a lot worse.
One thing that should be discussed is the prospect of Korb being in a battle for a roster spot with Jed Zayner. Korb has a lot of advantages heading into preseason camp - still being on the roster, lower salary, age, and not having Zayner's troublesome injury history - but Zayner is probably the better player today (hypothetically assuming both players are 100% fit). I doubt Korb is in any real danger of being cut, but if Zayner does prove to be healthy, Ben Olsen will probably only want to keep one of these two for 2012.
White, Najar, and King have only played right back sporadically and/or in reserve games. We may rarely see Najar switched to a nominal right back role if we're trailing, but in practice that would end up with him overlapping enough for us to look more like a 343 or 352 than the 442 Olsen prefers. King is probably going to be trying to learn how to play defensive midfield given our lack of depth there, so I doubt he'll get many chances to repeat the occasional reserve league experiments with him at right back.
We seem deep enough at right back to not pursue players for the job, especially given the fact that we have some pressing concerns up front and at left back. If someone comes along that is young, cheap, and better than Korb or Zayner, then we'd obviously have to take him, but there are better things to do than pursue such a player at the moment.
CENTER BACKS:
Brandon McDonald, Dejan Jakovic, Ethan White, Robbie Russell, Perry Kitchen, Conor Shanosky, Daniel Woolard
We didn't get to see much of our top center back pairing due to injuries to both players, but what we did see was promising. United only conceded 2 goals in the 339 minutes that both players were on the field, or roughly 0.53 goals over 90 minutes.
I don't put a huge amount of faith in statistics when it comes to soccer, though. What convinced me was seeing Jakovic finally allowed to be something other than the leader of our defense. That job is much more appropriate for McDonald, who has better anticipation than Jakovic and seems to have the kind of personality that others can feed off of. This allows Jakovic to use his overall athleticism to solve problems, which is what he's more comfortable with.
Ethan White proved to be slightly ahead of expectations for a 20 year old center back, and certainly has the athletic gifts to succeed over the long term. There is plenty of work to be done in terms of positioning and reading the game, but White is one of the top center backs in MLS under the age of 22. I'm completely fine with him being our back-up for Jakovic, who he resembles as a player more than McDonald.
After the top three is where we find ourselves with a problem. Russell, Kitchen, and Woolard are all currently the starter at a different position; of that group, Russell is the only one with a replacement (Korb) that I'd be comfortable with starting in MLS play. Russell would be the player I would use to replace McDonald as the leader of the back four; it's not his best position, but RSL used him there numerous times (especially before the emergence of Chris Schuler), and they seem to know what they're doing.
That leaves Conor Shanosky, who is probably going to be under pressure to contribute now that he's turned 20. I don't think we've seen enough of Shanosky to say with certainty that we can use him as our 4th choice center back, but that's what he is right now.
The thing about having that job for this United team is that you'll still have to play games. Jakovic's troublesome hamstrings have been a problem for his entire career here, and McDonald has also had his share of injuries. In fact, if United had a game today, Shanosky would make the bench or possibly even start (White has a knee problem, and both he and McDonald had sports hernia surgery a few weeks ago).
Given all this - injury-prone starters, raw young back-ups, and needs at other positions - it would seem to me that grabbing another center back should be somewhere on Olsen and Kasper's offseason to-do list. It's not as high up as some other things that we'll touch on as we look at the rest of the roster (spoiler: two starting jobs are up for grabs), but it's not exactly a luxury item either.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Korb vs. Zayner
That will be an interesting battle to watch in training camp.
I’m assuming that Korb is essentially guaranteed a spot on this team. They’re not going to cut him. But Zayner still needs to be ahead of Korb on the depth chart (and probably by a good margin) in order to earn a roster spot. Even if Zayner is fully healthy, if Olsen views these two as roughly equal, its hard to see Zayner surviving.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
Not to give too much away from the next post
Zayner’s best hope might actually be that we don’t sign a left back, which means either him or Korb is the back-up for Woolard. That would be bad for us, but it’s conceivable.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Dec 28, 2011 6:51 PM EST up reply actions
Left back..
If DC can find a left back out there, the team would have a pretty solid back line to start the season, and have some decent depth with Korn, White, Woolard and possibly Zayner in reserve. I would assume there’s an 8th defender in there, besides Shanosky, who isn’t ready for MLS yet — so, i think Zayner has a decent shot.
Room enough
I think the team probably does have room enough for Korb and Zayner. Korb is the long-term hope at RB, but Zayner is probably the steadier player. Besides, if RUssell does get hurt, I don’t think the team would feel good about their options after Korb. Ofco urse, the team does have other needs to fill — and I’m stunned that they haven’t done anything about it yet.
They’ve lost Burmudez to San Jose, so it’s back the drawing board in terms of bolstering the back line. If Tyler Polak gets a GA deal, we might fill our long-term left back need there. Otherwise, the team will be drafting for depth — either Martinez or Silva in the midfield, or maybe Townsend up top. Which means the team will have to push really hard to find a left back in the international market, along with a decent striker to pair with DeRo (Wolff is a nice option, but can’t be counted on to make it through a full season). If Pontius goes up top, then the need will be for a left wing — and if Bosco moves to the wing, then there’s a huge hole in the middle of the pitch. Somewhere, the team is going to have to score a big signing.
Then, there’s goalie — who will step up when Hamid is away. Willis was a nice surprise, but they definitely need another. Ultimately, they have to be thinking about a long-term replacement for Hamid. Maybe that player is still in the Academy, but I think they need to find a more experienced and battle-ready player.
Bernardez
I don’t think we “lost” Bernardez, at least based on one MLS Rumors mention linking him to us. There would have needed to be more heat to that rumor to buy it. Plus, I’m guessing that even if it was down to us or San Jose, they were willing to pay a higher salary (since they need a starting center back, while we just need another center back of some kind).
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Dec 29, 2011 6:12 PM EST up reply actions
I knew I had his name wrong
From what MLS-rumors wrote, it seemed to be a discovery claim debate — which it now seems DCU lost. It could have been money, but I’m inclined to think their reporting was spot on about it being a rights issue. It was too specific to be just “rumor.”
Salary budget players and my broken record
I’ve looked over the roster, because I have a theory that the team isn’t even going to try and fill out a 30-man or even the supposed minimum 28-man roster, if they cannot do it without hitting the team’s bottom line. I’m imagining the order has gone out to make sure new players do not cost the team anything. So, they would want to maximize the salary budget. Without even playing guessing games about dollar figures (the 2012 cap figure is ($2.81 million even before allocations are added in — can the team come close to spending that money?), there’s still a problem just with the number of guys the team has to find.
The union/league rules will require the team to have a salary budget roster of 18-20 players, with the remainder 8-12 slots being off-budget. DCU lists 10 players as Salary Budget or DP. They do, however, list Kitchen as GA — which, I believe he graduated from, causing DCU to protect him in the expansion draft. Also, there’s some question that others have raised — Chest? — about whether Hamid is still off-budget as Homegrown, given his new deal. Let’s say the team moves those two guys to the budget and maybe even Stephen King, too. That leaves a minimum of 5 additional players that must be added to the budget.
It’s possible the team will draft a senior who could be included in the budget, but they might find themselves picking a GA player. So, they would still have to bring in at least 5 more players that make the team and go into the budget/cap figure — and I may be understating the number of open salary budget roster slots.
It’s almost January. Camp starts in a few weeks. Other teams are busy adding in European and Central American talent, while DCU has sat pat. I realize the January window hasn’t even opened for some Euro leagues, but that hasn’t stopped teams like the Sounders from raiding Scandinavia., while the Union and other teams have been busy shopping in South America. When and where will the DC United find the necessary talent? The clock is ticking.
Roster mechanics
It’s supposed to go like this:
18-20 on-budget
6 cap exempt under-25s(Homegrowns or GAs)
4 off-budget
To the best of my knowledge, here’s how we line up right now:
12 on-budget
(McDonald, Russell, Jakovic, Morsink, De Rosario, Boskovic, Pontius, Wolff, King, Woolard, Kitchen, Brettschneider)
4 cap exempt under-25s
(Hamid, Najar, White, Shanosky)
2 off-budget
(Korb, Willis)
If this is accurate (I’m not 100% sure on this, because I don’t remember if the Hamid situation was ever fully clarified and I never noted it either way), we are obliged to sign 6 players, or sign 4 and promote Korb and Willis. That’s the bare minimum. Also, I’m counting Morsink given the club’s public stance that he’s all but re-signed.
Considering the fact that we need 2 strikers, a left back, and probably 2 wide midfielders, I’m not worried about meeting the union requirements. I’m just worried about us signing good players for those roles.
Writer on SBN's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14 | KEEP UNITED IN DC
by ChestRockwell on Dec 29, 2011 6:42 PM EST up reply actions
I was going off the DCU site info
It does seem to be based on last season’s status, though Kitchen has lost GA status. Hamid is still listed as HG. The cap exempt 25s you note are Homegrowns. That’s their cap exemption. As far as I can find there is no rule about being under 25. There is a U23 rule for DPss that lowers the cap hit. There is also a rule that lets teams pay under 25 players less than the standard 42k league minimum.
As far as I can tell, there is no restriction on which players are on or off-budget teams get to decide which 18-20 players are on budget. All the rest are off-budget regardless of status. They don’t need to be under a certain age. King is still listed as off-budget, but the team could decide to change that. I think the only guidance is to try and and find 18 or 20 players to divide up the $2.8 million budget. So, they would average at least $140k (more, if spread across only 18 players) — otherwise the team is letting cap space go to waste. That’s why the players making minimum tend to be off-budget.
Right now, DCU lists 10 Salary Budget players, but I think we can agree that Kitchen must be in the budget. They have to add seven players to the budget. While some of that could be done with players already on the roster (King, Korb, Willis), they’re still going to have to find at least ten players to fill out the roster. Presumably we’re looking at one or two MLS vets, a draft pick or two (probably one off-budget GA player), and 6-8 foreign signings. Since the foreign players will cost more than the guys that are off-budget now, it seems likely that the budget slots will go to these foreign signings…or to the Unicorns, who may be less mythical.
















