D.C. United 1, Columbus Crew 2 - Match Review & Player Ratings
Do you guys remember this story? The one about how D.C. United has two defenders in Perry Kitchen and Ethan White who could be future members of the U.S. National Team? A number that is now three with the leadership of Brandon McDonald. Four if you add in Dejan Jakovic and his own respective country. Five if you want to throw a goalkeeper in there too with Bill Hamid.
Yeah, they're not quite there yet.
That's become evident this week. And when you consider that three of these young potential stars were out injured or suspended for today's loss to the Columbus Crew, you realize that the result should not have been surprising. But you should also realize that our defense's best days are still ahead of it.
There were always going to be letdowns along the way for this young team. Those are just amplified now towards the end of the season. And the season isn't over yet, by the way, no matter how bad this week feels. United still has an outside chance of making the playoffs. Even though the number of points they'll need to earn in their last four games isn't much short of 12 at this point. They could still make it. But if they don't, we still have a lot to look forward to.
Full recap here. Player ratings below.

I remember a game back in July 2009 in which Bryan Namoff did what Daniel Woolard did today. He scored a goal for both teams. Namoff's was way cooler though. He gave up an own goal early in the game against the Colorado Rapids, and then he actually gave United the lead later in the game with a diving header goal to make it 2-1. Woolard, on the other hand, put United in front 1-0 late in the second half by finishing off a DeRo free kick with a clean left-footed one-time shot, but then gave back a goal early in the second half with a poor clearance into Hamid's net. Defenders don't usually want to be in the headlines for their teams. Woolard definitely was tonight.

United didn't get enough production out of the forwards tonight. Charlie Davies proved once again that he doesn't have much to offer without some good service and a competent partner. Well Joseph Ngwenya wasn't a competent partner today (or at any point in 2011).

So where were Santino Quaranta and Marc Burch during the Columbus go-ahead goal that saw Sebastian Miranda run free down the right wing? It's hard to say. They may have well been playing backgammon in the corner - that's how much effect they had on the play. To his credit, at least Clyde Simms was in the picture. Yeah, that was him running to the side of Eddie Gaven rather than, you know, marking him.
18 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I thought Chris Korb did ok
The goals didn’t come from his side, and he provided some nice service from the right. Here’s a wacky thought: do we trot Korb and Zayner out at right back next year and move Kitchen into the defensive midfielder role?
I have been pondering something similar
Although, my future RB is TBD. I wonder, if at some point, Kitchen will move back to his supposedly more natural role as a defensive mid. It’s not a wacky thought, but of all the pieces we need to upgrade, I don’t think Clyde Simms’ position is near the top of that list. Unless we do a formation change-a-roo and go 4-2-3-1. We could also consider using Clyde Simms as trade bait. Wait! That’s end of year stuff. Must…. focus…. this year… still….
I can live with half of that equation
We all know Kitchen will probably turn into a very good defensive midfielder, and that his presence in DC means that the clock is ticking on Simms.
However, I’m not yet prepared to let Simms go if our right backs are Korb (who has promise, but also has a long way to go) and Zayner (whose injury history is too alarming to trust at this point). If we find ourselves with a strong right back – via draft, trade, or a signing from abroad – then it will be time to move Kitchen to defensive midfield. If not, though, we’d be weakening our line-up as a whole.
In this particular game, I don’t think Simms had a poor outing. His first half was a classic example of a defensive midfielder doing something that just won’t get much credit. He was pretty often in passing lanes, forcing Ekpo and Gaven to choose more easily defended options. He wasn’t as good in the 2nd half, but the fact that he was near Gaven was because others had abandoned their posts; I don’t really blame the goal on him at all. However, Ekpo did look better in the 2nd half, and Simms also didn’t contribute too much to our attempts at an equalizer.
Writer on SB Nation's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14
by ChestRockwell on Oct 4, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions
Did Namoff get the 3 or Woolard?
I was pondering giving Woolard a hard time because of the OG, but now that I actually think back on the match, he probably was our best player (defender, anyway). He handled the physical Crew strikers better than I would have imagined if you told me before the match he’d be playing CB! He was chippy a gave as good as he took. Plus the own goal wasn’t really his fault. More of a wrong place at the wrong time kind of thing, at least from what I could tell on the replays. It wasn’t an awe inspiring performance, but on a day of “meh” performances, not too shabby.
Since we gave DeRo an unprecedented 6 in a previous rating, can we ponder giving a 0? We’ll call it the Joey.
0 rating should be Chris Albright
Or, if there’s a picture of it somewhere, Ray Hudson half-mooning hecklers in Dallas back in 2003.
Writer on SB Nation's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14
by ChestRockwell on Oct 4, 2011 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions
The Future
Yes, it’s early, but MS raised the topic by discussing the future of the defense. It’s easy to envision a much-improved D with the maturing of the young players.
But what about the front line. DCU has vastly improved its goal total this season, largely because of Davies and DeRo. But what of next season? Do either or both return? When will DeRo begin showing his age? Will Davies be able to play a full match at top speed?
Wolff has become a part-timer. Ngwenya is useless. Pontius, assuming he recovers to full form, plays well up top, but will Olsen play him there? How long does it take for Brettschneider to develop? DCU has some serious offseason moves to make at forward.
Let’s not even think about the midfield — and when Europe comes calling for Najar.
The future of this team will be directly related to iour internation scouting
United will not be able to compete with the best teams in the league when its only methods of player acquisition are trades and the draft. Kasper and Olsen did really well in both of those this past year, but its just not sustainable. Unless Brettschneider turns into Wondolowski this offseason, that strategy will only get us in playoff contention, but not championship contention.
I’m tired of watching other teams find guys like Montero, Saborio, Pappa, and Chavez. Davies was a brilliant short-term solution. Now go find us a younger version of Emilio.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
by Martin Shatzer on Oct 3, 2011 10:38 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It feels like we're becoming the starter team for future national team players
How can we be so bad at scouting? I don’t know the mechanics of such things in MLS, but you’d think we’d be better. Let’s just hope we don’t dig up another Rodrigo Brasesco this January. But hey, our academy is producing talent, so that’s good. We’re probably ahead of other teams on that front.
What really sucks is
DCU on its best day is soooo much better than the Crew on its best day. But they’ll make the playoffs and we probably won’t.
The same is true about the Union, but with a few less o’s.
Managing Editor for BlackAndRedUnited.com. Weekly Columnist for SB Nation D.C..
by Martin Shatzer on Oct 3, 2011 10:44 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
As much as I want to sulk and be disgruntled right now,
my wife gave me a little dose of perspective this morning: We are soooo much better than last year. The fact that we still have a legitimate shot at the playoffs one year after arguably the worst season for any team ever in MLS says much. Even if we go 0-4 in our last 4 games, it still won’t mean that this season was a failure. Heck, everyone on this board felt this season was a rebuilding year up until the DeRo trade. Who is to say that it has not been? Let’s keep our heads up.
by DCUFaninMissouri on Oct 3, 2011 12:21 PM EDT reply actions
I wouldn't say failure by any stretch
Last year was epic fail. But I’d definitely call this year disappointing if we miss the playoffs. Perhaps expectations were/are too high, but that’s what comes with being a team that’s won so many trophies.
Past trophies ...
… are no guarantee of continued hardware acquisition. Ask Liverpool. Yes, no playoffs will be a disappointment. Just like the DCU defense.
by Runningcloud on Oct 3, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions
Are we really this pessimistic as a fanbase?
I don’t think we’re in such a bad spot. Maybe it’s my natural tendency to never get too high or too low, but some of these comments read like we’re where Chivas or San Jose are (right on the brink of elimination).
3 home games and a road match against the worst team in MLS. We almost got something in Columbus despite starting a back four that wouldn’t keep a clean sheet in the Reserve League.
I agree that we are running out of time, but we’re also not in big trouble yet either. We don’t play a single out-and-out good team for the rest of the season. Vancouver’s lack of maturity and slowness in midfield is something we can exploit all day long. Chicago has been good of late, but they also struggle with a lot of what we can do. Portland is like a slightly inferior version of us. Sporting, for all their home wins, are hardly road warriors and are still soft defensively.
Every single one of our remaining games can be won, and if we’re being honest, should be won. The schedule is very kind for us; we just need to take advantage.
If NYRB wins tonight and we lose in Vancouver, then we can start worrying. Right now, after coming within inches of a road draw against a team playing like their lives depended on it, I’m not ready to panic.
Writer on SB Nation's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14
Like Chivas or San Jose supporters?
How dare you, sir. Haha! I got a laugh just reading that. It did make me feel better that at least we’re not that bad off. I tend to get too high and too low with my team’s performances. I’m a pathetic roller coaster of emotions all year long because of silly sporting events.
On this particular game
Thoughts on every player:
Hamid: Not much he could do about either goal, and I thought he came off his line well when needed. Given the back four we had, things didn’t look as chaotic as I feared they would, and he deserves some of the credit there.
Korb: Not bad for someone who has been out for so long. His late cross that De Ro nearly headed in from the top of the box was what Burch is supposed to be able to do from the left, but strangely never does. Duka might be the weakest opposing left midfielder he’ll face all year, though.
Kitchen: Did a lot of brave, Julius James-style defending. Likely the top reason we stayed somewhat organized. Also looked good playing defensive midfield when we moved to the 3142 late. Not a perfect game, but better than his early-season outings at center back.
Woolard: Scored a nice goal, and played a lot like Kitchen did, blocking shots and battling. The own goal is just poor luck more than anything else. Slightly behind Kitchen in my book, but maybe that’s because he was stuck dealing with messes created by…
Burch: Very poor game. Other than one precise long ball for Davies, Burch didn’t contribute to the attack and his defending was worse than his normal mediocrity.
Najar: Not a very good first half hour (lazy pass nearly gave the Crew a goal early), but improved with every passing minute. Best player on the field over the last 15. Horribly unlucky to hit the bar in stoppage time.
Simms: See earlier post. One additional note: Could have gotten 2nd yellow card just before halftime, though I thought 1st yellow was bogus since Ekpo had clearly fouled Simms just before. Baldomero Toledo didn’t screw us on any big occasions, but he got numerous small calls wrong throughout the game.
De Rosario: Inch-perfect free kick gave us our first goal; that ball couldn’t have been better. Could have been better in the 1st half, but was involved with nearly everything we did during the late-game push for a goal.
Quaranta: Poor game overall, but his first half actually wasn’t bad. Made a superb run – coordinated with Davies and Ngwenya checking deep – to create a partial breakaway (should have put the shot on goal though), had a great switch to Najar, and also drew the attention of James (allowing Woolard to run free and score our goal). That said, he also faded out of the game on offense, and his defending was nowhere near good enough. When that’s the quality he has over Da Luz in the battle for that spot, an outing like this is a severe disappointment.
Ngwenya: Worked even harder than usual, and that actually generated some offense. Still, his tendency to always check back left us in almost a 4141 instead of a 442, and he again brought markers closer to De Ro. Not a perfect outing by any means, but better; if he’s going to have to be used, this should be the bare minimum for him.
Davies: Kind of isolated due to Ngwenya’s fear of being anywhere near the goal. I liked seeing him try to take people 1v1, but most of the time the smarter thing to do was to try holding the ball up or carrying it wide to allow support to arrive. Our lack of possession for the first hour of the game was a big part of why Davies didn’t contribute much.
King: Not bad. Worked hard to support people when we were in the 3142, but seemed unable to contribute more than that.
Da Luz: Got himself involved over the last 15 minutes, though the fact that he wasn’t having to defend at all helped. He was playing the right way, though, looking for combinations while staying wide enough to prevent Columbus from totally clogging the middle.
Wolff: Provided a significant spark to the offense, regardless of the formation change. His ability to play more quickly than Ngwenya is just as vital as his not always checking away from goal. The 10 day gap will help him get fit; I think he can be particularly useful against Vancouver.
Writer on SB Nation's DC United blog Black and Red United | @ChestRockwell14
We tend to play pretty well after a long break
So that’s why I feel pretty confident about a good showing in Vancouver. After that, though? It’s all up in the air.

by 













